Optimized tRNA structure–seq reveals robust tRNA secondary structures in <i>S. cerevisiae</i> under mild stress conditions

RNA structure plays a crucial role in diverse biological processes beyond the translation of genetic information. Therefore, the development of reliable methods for RNA structure prediction is essential for understanding RNA structure–related functions, however accurate and comprehensive RNA structure prediction remains challenging. Here, we focus on secondary structure prediction of transfer RNA (tRNA) using structure probing coupled with next–generation sequencing (tRNA Structure–seq). In silico prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA secondary structures achieves only 56.9% accuracy on average. Incorporation of dimethyl sulfate (DMS) probing data improve prediction accuracy to 87.4%, which is still not sufficient for practical tRNA structure prediction. To overcome this, we optimized the tRNA Structure–seq analysis pipeline by explicitly incorporating natural tRNA modifications detected in tRNA sequencing data and by refining pseudo–free energy parameters specifically optimized for tRNA structure prediction. Using this optimized pipeline, the average prediction accuracy is remarkably improved to 93.3%. Furthermore, analysis of multiple structural conformations predicted from DMS probing data indicates that S. cerevisiae tRNAs predominantly adopt the canonical cloverleaf secondary structure under in vivo conditions. Finally, we examined tRNA structures under mild stress conditions, including heat stress, osmotic stress, and antibiotic stress. These perturbations had minimal effects on in vivo tRNA secondary structure, demonstrating that S. cerevisiae tRNAs maintain structural stability under physiologically relevant stress conditions. In summary, our results establish an optimized tRNA Structure–seq analysis that enables highly accurate tRNA secondary structure prediction and reveals the intrinsic robustness of tRNA structures in living cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RNA
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.081029.126
Primary Topic
RNA modifications and cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized tRNA structure–seq reveals robust tRNA secondary structures in S. cerevisiae under mild stress conditions

Ryota Yamagami, Akira Hirata, Philip C. Bevilacqua, Teppei Matsuda et al.
RNA
RNA modifications and cancer
article

Optimized tRNA structure–seq reveals robust tRNA secondary structures in S. cerevisiae under mild stress conditions

Ryota Yamagami, Akira Hirata, Philip C. Bevilacqua, Teppei Matsuda, Futa Konishi, Komei Yanagihara, Hiroyuki Hori
article en

Abstract

RNA structure plays a crucial role in diverse biological processes beyond the translation of genetic information. Therefore, the development of reliable methods for RNA structure prediction is essential for understanding RNA structure–related functions, however accurate and comprehensive RNA structure prediction remains challenging. Here, we focus on secondary structure prediction of transfer RNA (tRNA) using structure probing coupled with next–generation sequencing (tRNA Structure–seq). In silico prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA secondary structures achieves only 56.9% accuracy on average. Incorporation of dimethyl sulfate (DMS) probing data improve prediction accuracy to 87.4%, which is still not sufficient for practical tRNA structure prediction. To overcome this, we optimized the tRNA Structure–seq analysis pipeline by explicitly incorporating natural tRNA modifications detected in tRNA sequencing data and by refining pseudo–free energy parameters specifically optimized for tRNA structure prediction. Using this optimized pipeline, the average prediction accuracy is remarkably improved to 93.3%. Furthermore, analysis of multiple structural conformations predicted from DMS probing data indicates that S. cerevisiae tRNAs predominantly adopt the canonical cloverleaf secondary structure under in vivo conditions. Finally, we examined tRNA structures under mild stress conditions, including heat stress, osmotic stress, and antibiotic stress. These perturbations had minimal effects on in vivo tRNA secondary structure, demonstrating that S. cerevisiae tRNAs maintain structural stability under physiologically relevant stress conditions. In summary, our results establish an optimized tRNA Structure–seq analysis that enables highly accurate tRNA secondary structure prediction and reveals the intrinsic robustness of tRNA structures in living cells.

RNA
Pennsylvania State University (US), Ehime University (JP), Tokushima University (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
RNA modifications and cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.