Carceral Time & Decarceral Time: An Account of Prison Temporality

Abstract: What is the meaning of "time" when one is "doing time'? Through a phenomenological analysis of first-person accounts, this article considers the imprint incarceration enacts upon a person's primary experience of time. This is termed carceral time, and includes experiences such as the social death of incarceration, temporal stasis, natal alienation, carceral captivity, and the foreclosing of diachronic agency. Retributivists—including Kant and Hegel—assert that punishment is justified when it is proportional to the crime. Yet, the proportionality of a prison sentence hinges on the assumption that carceral time can be calculated in terms of its equivalency or economic exchangeability to free people's experience of time. In evaluating whether incarceration is just, one must consider the impact it has on the incarcerated person. The testimonies on carceral time evince that incarceration indelibly inscribes the whole of an individual's temporal horizon and is not quantifiably proportional to ordinary 'free" experiences of time. This undermines the concept of proportional time at the heart of retributivist arguments, but also, potentially, the justness of the justice system. This article concludes by drawing on prominent carceral theorists, abolitionists, and critical phenomenologists to consider possible tactics of temporal repair termed 'decarceral time."

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theory & Event
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2026.a993499
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carceral Time & Decarceral Time: An Account of Prison Temporality

Hannah R. Bacon
Theory & Event
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Carceral Time & Decarceral Time: An Account of Prison Temporality

Hannah R. Bacon
article en

Abstract

Abstract: What is the meaning of "time" when one is "doing time'? Through a phenomenological analysis of first-person accounts, this article considers the imprint incarceration enacts upon a person's primary experience of time. This is termed carceral time, and includes experiences such as the social death of incarceration, temporal stasis, natal alienation, carceral captivity, and the foreclosing of diachronic agency. Retributivists—including Kant and Hegel—assert that punishment is justified when it is proportional to the crime. Yet, the proportionality of a prison sentence hinges on the assumption that carceral time can be calculated in terms of its equivalency or economic exchangeability to free people's experience of time. In evaluating whether incarceration is just, one must consider the impact it has on the incarcerated person. The testimonies on carceral time evince that incarceration indelibly inscribes the whole of an individual's temporal horizon and is not quantifiably proportional to ordinary 'free" experiences of time. This undermines the concept of proportional time at the heart of retributivist arguments, but also, potentially, the justness of the justice system. This article concludes by drawing on prominent carceral theorists, abolitionists, and critical phenomenologists to consider possible tactics of temporal repair termed 'decarceral time."

Theory & EventVol. 29(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.