Uncovering Mental Health Stigma in Undergraduates From Different Study Fields

BACKGROUND: People with mental disorders (PMD) not only face difficulties related to their mental health problems, but also suffer from the stigma and discrimination associated with them. Research on social stigma in the educational setting has been mainly focused on health sciences students. AIMS: The main objective was to compare the level of social stigma toward PMD among university students, categorized by their fields of study. Additionally, the analysis considered gender, knowledge about mental health, familiarity, and contact. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all first-year undergraduate students during the 2023-24 course at the University of Valencia, who were enrolled in five study fields: Engineering and Architecture (EA), Arts and Humanities (AH), Social and Legal Sciences (SL), Sciences (SC) and Health Sciences (HS). All students completed online an initial questionnaire with socio-demographic items, as well as the following questionnaires: The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS), the Scale of Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness (CAMI), and the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27). RESULTS: The final sample comprised 2,693 students. The EA students scored highest in authoritarianism and social restrictiveness, and lowest in benevolence and CMHI. Students from SL had higher levels of public stigma than those from AH, SC and HS. Considering only women, EA had the highest scores in authoritarianism. EA men had lower benevolence and lower CMHI. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that anti-stigma programs conducted at higher education institutions, in addition to traditional health sciences students, should target students from other study fields. This paper goes a step further by proposing that university curricula should include activities to improve understanding of mental health problems and reduce social stigma associated with PMD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640261456751
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering Mental Health Stigma in Undergraduates From Different Study Fields

Carmen Dasí, Vicent Balanzá‐Martínez, Inmaculada Fuentes-Durá, Juan Carlos Ruíz et al.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Uncovering Mental Health Stigma in Undergraduates From Different Study Fields

Carmen Dasí, Vicent Balanzá‐Martínez, Inmaculada Fuentes-Durá, Juan Carlos Ruíz, Lucía Fau-Camarasa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with mental disorders (PMD) not only face difficulties related to their mental health problems, but also suffer from the stigma and discrimination associated with them. Research on social stigma in the educational setting has been mainly focused on health sciences students. AIMS: The main objective was to compare the level of social stigma toward PMD among university students, categorized by their fields of study. Additionally, the analysis considered gender, knowledge about mental health, familiarity, and contact. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all first-year undergraduate students during the 2023-24 course at the University of Valencia, who were enrolled in five study fields: Engineering and Architecture (EA), Arts and Humanities (AH), Social and Legal Sciences (SL), Sciences (SC) and Health Sciences (HS). All students completed online an initial questionnaire with socio-demographic items, as well as the following questionnaires: The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS), the Scale of Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness (CAMI), and the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27). RESULTS: The final sample comprised 2,693 students. The EA students scored highest in authoritarianism and social restrictiveness, and lowest in benevolence and CMHI. Students from SL had higher levels of public stigma than those from AH, SC and HS. Considering only women, EA had the highest scores in authoritarianism. EA men had lower benevolence and lower CMHI. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that anti-stigma programs conducted at higher education institutions, in addition to traditional health sciences students, should target students from other study fields. This paper goes a step further by proposing that university curricula should include activities to improve understanding of mental health problems and reduce social stigma associated with PMD.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Universitat de València (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), INCLIVA Health Research Institute (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.