Facial feature removal in magnetic resonance imaging scans of adults with Down syndrome: A de‐facing methodological study

INTRODUCTION: Face identification algorithms have increased the risk of study participants being identified through different neuroimaging modalities. De-facing algorithms can de-identify neuroimages; however, none are validated in individuals with Down syndrome (DS) - a population at high risk of Alzheimer's disease and the focus of numerous Alzheimer's disease cohort studies. METHODS: Overall, 37 adults with DS were parcellated using FreeSurfer before and after de-facing with mri_reface. A group of neurotypically developed individuals balanced on age, sex, and magnetic resonance imaging scanner manufacturer served as controls. RESULTS: De-facing produced no effect on cortical thickness or volumetrics in adults with DS compared to controls or regional discrimination based on an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis after correcting for multiple comparisons. DISCUSSION: FreeSurfer-derived volumetric and cortical thickness measures changed minimally following de-facing with mri_reface in adults with DS and are unlikely to influence study outcomes. De-facing should be considered prior to data sharing in studies of adults with DS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71614
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial feature removal in magnetic resonance imaging scans of adults with Down syndrome: A de‐facing methodological study

Scott A. Przybelski, Michael S. Rafii, Jason K Russell, Jonathan Graff‐Radford et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Facial feature removal in magnetic resonance imaging scans of adults with Down syndrome: A de‐facing methodological study

Scott A. Przybelski, Michael S. Rafii, Jason K Russell, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Ronald C. Petersen, Christopher G. Schwarz, Walter K. Kremers, Prashanthi Vemuri, Clifford R. Jack
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Face identification algorithms have increased the risk of study participants being identified through different neuroimaging modalities. De-facing algorithms can de-identify neuroimages; however, none are validated in individuals with Down syndrome (DS) - a population at high risk of Alzheimer's disease and the focus of numerous Alzheimer's disease cohort studies. METHODS: Overall, 37 adults with DS were parcellated using FreeSurfer before and after de-facing with mri_reface. A group of neurotypically developed individuals balanced on age, sex, and magnetic resonance imaging scanner manufacturer served as controls. RESULTS: De-facing produced no effect on cortical thickness or volumetrics in adults with DS compared to controls or regional discrimination based on an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis after correcting for multiple comparisons. DISCUSSION: FreeSurfer-derived volumetric and cortical thickness measures changed minimally following de-facing with mri_reface in adults with DS and are unlikely to influence study outcomes. De-facing should be considered prior to data sharing in studies of adults with DS.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 22(7)
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Southern States University (US)
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, GHR Foundation, Elsie and Marvin Dekelboum Family Foundation, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.