Distal Radius Osteosynthesis with Volar Locking Plate versus Dorsal Locking Plate: A Matched Comparative Cohort

Abstract Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common injuries in orthopaedic emergency care and often require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced and intra-articular fractures. Volar locking plates (VLPs) and dorsal locking plates (DLPs) are widely used options, each with specific anatomical considerations and distinct complication profiles. This study aims to compare functional and radiographic outcomes and complication rates between fixation with a VLP and a DLP in the treatment of DRFs. This retrospective cohort study included patients with DRFs treated surgically between 2015 and 2021. A total of 32 patients who underwent DLP fixation were first identified. Subsequently, 32 matching VLP controls were manually selected during the same period based on age, sex, and fracture classification, resulting in a total study population of 64 patients. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Radiographic outcomes and complications were also analyzed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Functional outcomes (PRWE and VAS) showed no statistically significant differences between the VLP and DLP groups. Radiographic analysis demonstrated significant improvements between preoperative and postoperative parameters in both groups, with no significant differences between them. Complications occurred in 25% of patients in the VLP group and 15.6% in the DLP group, including hardware removal in 9.4% and 3.1%, respectively, with no statistical significance. Both techniques adequately restored anatomical parameters and provided satisfactory functional outcomes. Although a higher absolute frequency of complications was observed in the VLP group, the findings are consistent with the literature, suggesting comparable efficacy and safety between techniques. The choice of approach should consider fracture complexity and surgeon experience. Fixation with a VLP and a DLP demonstrated similar functional and radiographic results, with no significant differences in complication rates, supporting the use of both techniques according to patient and fracture characteristics. Therapy, Level 2b.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2898-1414
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distal Radius Osteosynthesis with Volar Locking Plate versus Dorsal Locking Plate: A Matched Comparative Cohort

Aldo Okamura, Willker Galvão de Carvalho, Jorge Raduan Neto, Fernando Szuchman Wolquind et al.
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Distal Radius Osteosynthesis with Volar Locking Plate versus Dorsal Locking Plate: A Matched Comparative Cohort

Aldo Okamura, Willker Galvão de Carvalho, Jorge Raduan Neto, Fernando Szuchman Wolquind, Mauricio Foster Rodrigues, João Carlos Belloti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common injuries in orthopaedic emergency care and often require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced and intra-articular fractures. Volar locking plates (VLPs) and dorsal locking plates (DLPs) are widely used options, each with specific anatomical considerations and distinct complication profiles. This study aims to compare functional and radiographic outcomes and complication rates between fixation with a VLP and a DLP in the treatment of DRFs. This retrospective cohort study included patients with DRFs treated surgically between 2015 and 2021. A total of 32 patients who underwent DLP fixation were first identified. Subsequently, 32 matching VLP controls were manually selected during the same period based on age, sex, and fracture classification, resulting in a total study population of 64 patients. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Radiographic outcomes and complications were also analyzed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Functional outcomes (PRWE and VAS) showed no statistically significant differences between the VLP and DLP groups. Radiographic analysis demonstrated significant improvements between preoperative and postoperative parameters in both groups, with no significant differences between them. Complications occurred in 25% of patients in the VLP group and 15.6% in the DLP group, including hardware removal in 9.4% and 3.1%, respectively, with no statistical significance. Both techniques adequately restored anatomical parameters and provided satisfactory functional outcomes. Although a higher absolute frequency of complications was observed in the VLP group, the findings are consistent with the literature, suggesting comparable efficacy and safety between techniques. The choice of approach should consider fracture complexity and surgeon experience. Fixation with a VLP and a DLP demonstrated similar functional and radiographic results, with no significant differences in complication rates, supporting the use of both techniques according to patient and fracture characteristics. Therapy, Level 2b.

Journal of Wrist Surgery
Hospital Alvorada (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.