Real-World Data on the Use of Nivolumab Monotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Therapy: Final Results from the Non-Interventional NORA Study
Background/Objectives: Nivolumab monotherapy is a standard of care in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) and was approved based on the results of the randomized clinical trial Checkmate-025. The non-interventional study (NIS) NORA collected data on the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in real-world clinical routine. Its final, long-term follow-up data are presented here. Methods: NORA was a prospective, multicentre NIS recruiting at 54 German sites, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in pre-treated patients with aRCC. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: A total of 232 patients were eligible. Of the patients, 15% had favourable, 58% had intermediate, and 15% had poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium. Of the patients, 77% received nivolumab as second-line, 15% as third-line, and 8% as ≥fourth-line therapy. With a median long-term follow-up of 76 months (minimum 62 months), median OS was 22.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.5–25.9) and median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.2–5.4). The ORR was 21% with a median DOR of 27.9 months (95% CI 15.9—not evaluable). Of the patients, 47% and 16% had treatment-related adverse events of all grades and of grades 3–4, respectively. One patient died from autoimmune hepatitis related to treatment. PROs did not reveal any new signals. Conclusions: The long-term follow-up of NORA confirms that nivolumab monotherapy is an effective and safe therapy in patients with aRCC after prior therapy. With comparable follow-up times, our real-world data were not substantially different from the final long-term results of the pivotal Checkmate-025 study.
Authors
- Holger Schulz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5375-0030)
- Viktor Grünwald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-7687)
- Marc‐Oliver Grimm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-8654)
- Philipp Ivanyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2862-7302)
- H. Müller-Huesmann
- Luis R. Vaz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-1234)
- Martin Bögemann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2569-4446)
- Martin Schostak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-2096)
- Jens Bedke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-3108)
- Wolfgang Schultze‐Seemann
- Stefan W. Grötzinger
- Eyck von der Heyde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0996-0261)
- Martin Herber
Institutions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (DE)
- University Hospital Münster (DE)
- Olgahospital (DE)
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn (DE)
- Jena University Hospital (DE)
- University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (Italy) (IT)
- Klinikum Stuttgart (DE)
- West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE)
- Hannover Re (Germany) (DE)
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cancers
- Published
- 2026-06-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18132075
- Primary Topic
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Bristol-Myers Squibb