Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality in Endocarditis Patients?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe condition associated with significant in-hospital and long-term mortality despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and surgical management, highlighting the need for simple and reliable prognostic markers. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), derived from routine complete blood counts, have emerged as accessible inflammatory indices with potential prognostic value in cardiovascular and infectious diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to evaluate the ability of admission NLR and PLR to predict mortality in adult patients with IE. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science through May 2024 identified 7 eligible observational studies comprising 847 patients. Random-effects meta-analysis using restricted maximum likelihood estimation with Hartung-Knapp adjustment demonstrated that NLR levels were consistently higher among nonsurvivors than survivors, yielding a pooled standardized mean difference of 1.25 (95% CI -0.13 to 2.63), although statistical significance was not achieved and substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 94.5%). Diagnostic accuracy analysis demonstrated good prognostic performance of NLR for in-hospital mortality, with a pooled area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.57-1.00; P = 0.002) and no observed heterogeneity. Optimal NLR cutoff values ranged from approximately 5.5 to 9.8 across studies. Evidence regarding PLR was limited and inconsistent, preventing definitive conclusions regarding its prognostic utility. Overall, admission NLR appears to be an inexpensive, reproducible biomarker with good discriminative ability for predicting mortality in IE, although larger prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and clarify the role of PLR in risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001376
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality in Endocarditis Patients?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hanan Gruhonjic, Rakesh Prashad, Amro Assayed, Ashot Minasyan et al.
Cardiology in Review
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality in Endocarditis Patients?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hanan Gruhonjic, Rakesh Prashad, Amro Assayed, Ashot Minasyan, Daniel Fabian, Saif Aburumman, Amez Radha Faraj Salih, Kiven W. Ramos-Vega, Charles Ledonio, Abdul Haleem Altahhan
article en

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe condition associated with significant in-hospital and long-term mortality despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and surgical management, highlighting the need for simple and reliable prognostic markers. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), derived from routine complete blood counts, have emerged as accessible inflammatory indices with potential prognostic value in cardiovascular and infectious diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to evaluate the ability of admission NLR and PLR to predict mortality in adult patients with IE. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science through May 2024 identified 7 eligible observational studies comprising 847 patients. Random-effects meta-analysis using restricted maximum likelihood estimation with Hartung-Knapp adjustment demonstrated that NLR levels were consistently higher among nonsurvivors than survivors, yielding a pooled standardized mean difference of 1.25 (95% CI -0.13 to 2.63), although statistical significance was not achieved and substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 94.5%). Diagnostic accuracy analysis demonstrated good prognostic performance of NLR for in-hospital mortality, with a pooled area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.57-1.00; P = 0.002) and no observed heterogeneity. Optimal NLR cutoff values ranged from approximately 5.5 to 9.8 across studies. Evidence regarding PLR was limited and inconsistent, preventing definitive conclusions regarding its prognostic utility. Overall, admission NLR appears to be an inexpensive, reproducible biomarker with good discriminative ability for predicting mortality in IE, although larger prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and clarify the role of PLR in risk stratification.

Cardiology in Review
University of Central Florida (US), University of Jordan (JO), College of Central Florida (US), Cardiovascular Institute of Central Florida (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.