Holding on or letting go? addressing the continuation bias in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

This article examines the phenomenon of continuation bias within the Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (“IBC”). The IBC aims to reorganize financially distressed but economically viable companies, with the goal of value maximization. Continuation bias impacts the efficiency of the insolvency process and recovery by delaying liquidation. Due to a dearth of post-2016 Indian literature on this topic, this article relies on the continuation bias literature from the USA for conceptual foregrounding and explores whether the IBC exhibits continuation bias characteristics owing to the legislative framework and judicial decisions, while also providing a few policy recommendations. Compared to the previous legislation, the research does not find significant evidence of the bias within IBC but identifies gaps where such a bias could manifest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Law Review
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2026.2758033
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holding on or letting go? addressing the continuation bias in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

Saksham Shukla, Akshita Grover
1 links
Indian Law Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Holding on or letting go? addressing the continuation bias in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

Saksham Shukla, Akshita Grover
article en

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of continuation bias within the Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (“IBC”). The IBC aims to reorganize financially distressed but economically viable companies, with the goal of value maximization. Continuation bias impacts the efficiency of the insolvency process and recovery by delaying liquidation. Due to a dearth of post-2016 Indian literature on this topic, this article relies on the continuation bias literature from the USA for conceptual foregrounding and explores whether the IBC exhibits continuation bias characteristics owing to the legislative framework and judicial decisions, while also providing a few policy recommendations. Compared to the previous legislation, the research does not find significant evidence of the bias within IBC but identifies gaps where such a bias could manifest.

Indian Law Review
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Holding on or letting go? addressing the continuation bias in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 — Saksham Shukla, Akshita Grover · Indian Law Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS