Spinoza’s expansive necessitarianism

This paper argues that Spinoza is best understood as a necessitarian of a particularly radical kind: one who holds not only that the possible and the actual are coextensive, but further that the domain of actuality is as broad as the domain of conceivability. I call this view ‘expansive necessitarianism’ and contrast it with the more familiar ‘restrictive necessitarianism’. However, while EIp16 and related texts support a plenitudinous ontology, plenitude alone does not explain why the system of finite modes must take on the unique arrangement that it does. In this paper, I develop three Spinozistic constraints that sharply narrow the apparent possibility space: (i) the requirement that the series of finite modes is ontologically exhaustive, (ii) the infinite complexity of the laws of nature, and (iii) the universal causal integration entailed by Spinoza’s denial of the possibility of a physical vacuum. Together, these constraints eliminate all but one possible arrangement of finite modes, and Spinoza’s necessitarianism emerges as a distinctive and hitherto underappreciated metaphysics of modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2026.2677594
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spinoza’s expansive necessitarianism

David Harmon
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Spinoza’s expansive necessitarianism

David Harmon
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that Spinoza is best understood as a necessitarian of a particularly radical kind: one who holds not only that the possible and the actual are coextensive, but further that the domain of actuality is as broad as the domain of conceivability. I call this view ‘expansive necessitarianism’ and contrast it with the more familiar ‘restrictive necessitarianism’. However, while EIp16 and related texts support a plenitudinous ontology, plenitude alone does not explain why the system of finite modes must take on the unique arrangement that it does. In this paper, I develop three Spinozistic constraints that sharply narrow the apparent possibility space: (i) the requirement that the series of finite modes is ontologically exhaustive, (ii) the infinite complexity of the laws of nature, and (iii) the universal causal integration entailed by Spinoza’s denial of the possibility of a physical vacuum. Together, these constraints eliminate all but one possible arrangement of finite modes, and Spinoza’s necessitarianism emerges as a distinctive and hitherto underappreciated metaphysics of modality.

British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Andrews University (US), St. Andrews University (US), University of St Andrews (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.