Effective population size and Ne/N ratio for two populations of Northern chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) on the edge of the species’ distribution range

Abstract Background Effective population size (N e ) is a fundamental parameter in conservation genetics, providing relevant information on the adaptability and long-term viability of populations. In contrast, wildlife management strategies, particularly for hunted species, often rely on estimates of abundance (N) without incorporating genetic data. Accounting for N e in wildlife management concepts could add important information on population viability, especially for species that are regulated mainly by humans. The iconic mountain dwelling chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra ) is widespread throughout the Alps, and many populations are influenced by human activities, including hunting. Results We derived N e using genetic data from 16 microsatellite loci for two chamois populations in the Bavarian Alps, Germany. Estimates of N based on Bayesian spatial capture-recapture (SCR) from a previous study allowed us to calculate the N e /N ratio. N e values per generation in the two study areas were 514 (CI 342–949) and 179 (CI 129–266). Estimated median N e /N ratios were similar in both study areas but had large confidence intervals: 0.56 (CI 0.34–0.96) and 0.58 (CI 0.39–0.88). Confidence intervals of N e estimates varied between the two study areas, and sample size had a substantial influence on the precision of the estimates, as expected from previous studies. We discuss the challenges in obtaining robust N e /N estimates, which are crucial when N e and N are applied for conservation purposes. Conclusion N e /N ratios were similar between the two study areas, but confidence intervals were wide, reflecting substantial uncertainty. Even with extensive data, accurately estimating these ratios remains challenging, highlighting potential limitations for their use in population monitoring and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-026-02543-7
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective population size and Ne/N ratio for two populations of Northern chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) on the edge of the species’ distribution range

Cornelia Ebert, Susanne Jacobs, Wibke Peters, Hendrik Edelhoff
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Effective population size and Ne/N ratio for two populations of Northern chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) on the edge of the species’ distribution range

Cornelia Ebert, Susanne Jacobs, Wibke Peters, Hendrik Edelhoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective population size (N e ) is a fundamental parameter in conservation genetics, providing relevant information on the adaptability and long-term viability of populations. In contrast, wildlife management strategies, particularly for hunted species, often rely on estimates of abundance (N) without incorporating genetic data. Accounting for N e in wildlife management concepts could add important information on population viability, especially for species that are regulated mainly by humans. The iconic mountain dwelling chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra ) is widespread throughout the Alps, and many populations are influenced by human activities, including hunting. Results We derived N e using genetic data from 16 microsatellite loci for two chamois populations in the Bavarian Alps, Germany. Estimates of N based on Bayesian spatial capture-recapture (SCR) from a previous study allowed us to calculate the N e /N ratio. N e values per generation in the two study areas were 514 (CI 342–949) and 179 (CI 129–266). Estimated median N e /N ratios were similar in both study areas but had large confidence intervals: 0.56 (CI 0.34–0.96) and 0.58 (CI 0.39–0.88). Confidence intervals of N e estimates varied between the two study areas, and sample size had a substantial influence on the precision of the estimates, as expected from previous studies. We discuss the challenges in obtaining robust N e /N estimates, which are crucial when N e and N are applied for conservation purposes. Conclusion N e /N ratios were similar between the two study areas, but confidence intervals were wide, reflecting substantial uncertainty. Even with extensive data, accurately estimating these ratios remains challenging, highlighting potential limitations for their use in population monitoring and management.

BMC Ecology and Evolution
BMW (Germany) (DE), University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.