Australian Critical Raw Materials in the Global Security–Sustainability Nexus

Australia stands to benefit from the current global security–sustainability nexus, or the convergence of Western actions to meet both security and sustainability objectives, which are centred around the supply of critical raw materials (CRM). Australia is the largest producer of lithium, the third largest producer of cobalt, and the fourth largest producer of rare earth elements resources in the world. However, Australia’s realist pragmatic response to increasing tensions between the United States and China over CRM, which is exacerbating the trend towards resource nationalism, does not provide assurance for its national security. The article examines Australia’s resource liberalism which has embedded CRM mining companies and exports in Chinese dominated global supply chains. Despite limited efforts to emulate the great powers in industrial policy and enthusiasm for joining Western-led agreements, these do not protect Australia from great power rivalry, nor does its resource liberal orientation through open investments, CRM exports, and partnerships ensure its national security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Security
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796261459525
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australian Critical Raw Materials in the Global Security–Sustainability Nexus

Susan Park, Oliver Summerfield-Ryan
Environment and Security
Mining and Resource Management
article

Australian Critical Raw Materials in the Global Security–Sustainability Nexus

Susan Park, Oliver Summerfield-Ryan
article en

Abstract

Australia stands to benefit from the current global security–sustainability nexus, or the convergence of Western actions to meet both security and sustainability objectives, which are centred around the supply of critical raw materials (CRM). Australia is the largest producer of lithium, the third largest producer of cobalt, and the fourth largest producer of rare earth elements resources in the world. However, Australia’s realist pragmatic response to increasing tensions between the United States and China over CRM, which is exacerbating the trend towards resource nationalism, does not provide assurance for its national security. The article examines Australia’s resource liberalism which has embedded CRM mining companies and exports in Chinese dominated global supply chains. Despite limited efforts to emulate the great powers in industrial policy and enthusiasm for joining Western-led agreements, these do not protect Australia from great power rivalry, nor does its resource liberal orientation through open investments, CRM exports, and partnerships ensure its national security.

Environment and Security
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Australian Critical Raw Materials in the Global Security–Sustainability Nexus — Susan Park, Oliver Summerfield-Ryan · Environment and Security (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS