Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish <scp>TRIPLE</scp> ‐A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications substantially increase morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Understanding prognostic factors is essential for risk stratification, targeted prevention strategies, and development of prediction models. OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic factors for 18 major postoperative complications in 10 studied domains using the Danish TRIPLE-A database: (1) acute postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and need for rescue opioids; (2) persistent opioid use; (3) acute kidney injury; (4) venous thromboembolism; (5) staphylococcal surgical site infection and infections requiring antibiotic treatment; (6) three airway management complications; (7) transfusion requirements; (8) delirium; (9) new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation; and (10) readmission, reoperation and unplanned ICU admission. METHODS: We will conduct 10 retrospective cohort studies using electronic health record data from 1.2 million surgical procedures performed in the Capital and Zealand Regions of Denmark from 2017 to 2025. Each individual complication will be identified via validated combinations of ICD-10 codes, medication administration, laboratory values, radiology examinations, and free-text mining of clinical notes. Candidate prognostic factors will be selected a priori based on literature review and clinical expertise, and will encompass patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, anaesthetic management, vital parameters and biomarkers. We will estimate adjusted associations between candidate prognostic factors and complications using multivariable logistic regression with LASSO penalisation to reduce overfitting. Effect estimates will be reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and the relative contribution of predictors will be assessed by changes in model discrimination (Δ-AUC). The approach for surgical procedure, calendar year, and hospital site will be determined for each study (adjustment, stratification, or inclusion as candidate predictors). CONCLUSION: These studies aim to validate established prognostic factors and identify novel ones for major postoperative complications, providing a foundation for the development of individualised perioperative risk stratification models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70285
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish TRIPLE ‐A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries

Nichlas Hovmand, Helene Holm Laigaard, Anders Peder Højer Karlsen, Anders Kehlet Nørskov et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish TRIPLE ‐A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries

Nichlas Hovmand, Helene Holm Laigaard, Anders Peder Højer Karlsen, Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Jens Laigaard, Markus Harboe Olsen, Emil Ørskov Ipsen, Mathilde Fahrendorff, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, A Saito, Sebastian Buhl Rasmussen, Caroline Folkersen, Mik Wetterslev, Asta Prescott, Caroline Lando Klammer, Rebecca Kiær
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications substantially increase morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Understanding prognostic factors is essential for risk stratification, targeted prevention strategies, and development of prediction models. OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic factors for 18 major postoperative complications in 10 studied domains using the Danish TRIPLE-A database: (1) acute postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and need for rescue opioids; (2) persistent opioid use; (3) acute kidney injury; (4) venous thromboembolism; (5) staphylococcal surgical site infection and infections requiring antibiotic treatment; (6) three airway management complications; (7) transfusion requirements; (8) delirium; (9) new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation; and (10) readmission, reoperation and unplanned ICU admission. METHODS: We will conduct 10 retrospective cohort studies using electronic health record data from 1.2 million surgical procedures performed in the Capital and Zealand Regions of Denmark from 2017 to 2025. Each individual complication will be identified via validated combinations of ICD-10 codes, medication administration, laboratory values, radiology examinations, and free-text mining of clinical notes. Candidate prognostic factors will be selected a priori based on literature review and clinical expertise, and will encompass patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, anaesthetic management, vital parameters and biomarkers. We will estimate adjusted associations between candidate prognostic factors and complications using multivariable logistic regression with LASSO penalisation to reduce overfitting. Effect estimates will be reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and the relative contribution of predictors will be assessed by changes in model discrimination (Δ-AUC). The approach for surgical procedure, calendar year, and hospital site will be determined for each study (adjustment, stratification, or inclusion as candidate predictors). CONCLUSION: These studies aim to validate established prognostic factors and identify novel ones for major postoperative complications, providing a foundation for the development of individualised perioperative risk stratification models.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(7)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.