The politics of intimate citizenship: sweetheart visas and pandemic-era migration policy in Europe

During the COVID-19 pandemic, border closures separated thousands of people who were in cross-national, unmarried relationships. Sweethearts across the world protested using the refrain and hashtag, #LoveIsNotTourism. In response, twelve European countries introduced sweetheart visas to reunite couples excluded from family-based migration policies. This study compares sweetheart visas to traditional family/marriage visas to assess their significance and inclusivity. Using qualitative data from online forums and policy documents, it finds that while sweetheart visas often mirrored existing visa structures, the ambiguous definition allowed for broader recognition of intimate relationships – including non-marital, non-heteronormative, and polyamorous partnerships. The analysis also shows that countries with higher gender equality and less adherence to heteronormative norms were more likely to adopt sweetheart visas. This examination of how states temporarily expanded intimate citizenship beyond conventional family forms contributes to debates on migration governance, care regimes, and the politics of belonging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Identities
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289x.2026.2693391
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of intimate citizenship: sweetheart visas and pandemic-era migration policy in Europe

Sarah Swider
Identities
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

The politics of intimate citizenship: sweetheart visas and pandemic-era migration policy in Europe

Sarah Swider
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, border closures separated thousands of people who were in cross-national, unmarried relationships. Sweethearts across the world protested using the refrain and hashtag, #LoveIsNotTourism. In response, twelve European countries introduced sweetheart visas to reunite couples excluded from family-based migration policies. This study compares sweetheart visas to traditional family/marriage visas to assess their significance and inclusivity. Using qualitative data from online forums and policy documents, it finds that while sweetheart visas often mirrored existing visa structures, the ambiguous definition allowed for broader recognition of intimate relationships – including non-marital, non-heteronormative, and polyamorous partnerships. The analysis also shows that countries with higher gender equality and less adherence to heteronormative norms were more likely to adopt sweetheart visas. This examination of how states temporarily expanded intimate citizenship beyond conventional family forms contributes to debates on migration governance, care regimes, and the politics of belonging.

Identities
Wayne State University (US)
Wayne State University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of intimate citizenship: sweetheart visas and pandemic-era migration policy in Europe — Sarah Swider · Identities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS