Proposal for Revising KS P 3010:2024 Based on WHO Standards and Anatomical Terminology

Objectives : This study aims to propose systematic revisions to the Korean Standard for Acupuncture Point Locations (KS P 3010:2024) by assessing its anatomical clarity and formatting consistency in comparison with the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations (WHO Standard) and the Anatomical Terminology (6th edition).Methods : Location descriptions for 361 standard acupuncture points in KS P 3010:2024 were extracted and systematically compared with the WHO Standard and the Anatomical Terminology (6th edition).To reduce subjective bias, all identified discrepancies were independently cross-validated by the researchers.Proposed revisions were classified into two categories-anatomical clarity and format/notation consistency-and analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results : A total of 312 revisions were identified across 361 acupuncture points.Revisions related to 'anatomical clarity' accounted for 78.8% (246 cases), primarily involving anatomical term replacements (182 cases, 58.3%) and location or direction refinements (64 cases, 20.5%).The 'format and notation consistency' category comprised 21.2% (66 cases), mainly involving corrections to the identification numbers of adjacent points (33 cases, 10.6%), along with translation refinements and corrections of content mismatches.Conclusions : Through a systematic comparison with WHO Standard and Anatomical Terminology, this study identified 312 specific items requirng revision within KS P 3010:2024.The findings indicate a need for revisions to improve anatomical clarity and descriptive precision, mainly by standardizing anatomical terms and refining location descriptions.In addition, inconsistencies in formatting and notation-including errors in adjacent point identification numbers and translational discrepancies-should be addressed.The revisions proposed in this study provide a concrete framework to enhance the reliability of national standards, ensuring their effective integration into both academic education and digital healthcare industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Acupuncture
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14406/acu.2026.007
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposal for Revising KS P 3010:2024 Based on WHO Standards and Anatomical Terminology

Jowon Jang, Sabina Lim, Junho Sung
Korean Journal of Acupuncture
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

Proposal for Revising KS P 3010:2024 Based on WHO Standards and Anatomical Terminology

Jowon Jang, Sabina Lim, Junho Sung
article en

Abstract

Objectives : This study aims to propose systematic revisions to the Korean Standard for Acupuncture Point Locations (KS P 3010:2024) by assessing its anatomical clarity and formatting consistency in comparison with the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations (WHO Standard) and the Anatomical Terminology (6th edition).Methods : Location descriptions for 361 standard acupuncture points in KS P 3010:2024 were extracted and systematically compared with the WHO Standard and the Anatomical Terminology (6th edition).To reduce subjective bias, all identified discrepancies were independently cross-validated by the researchers.Proposed revisions were classified into two categories-anatomical clarity and format/notation consistency-and analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results : A total of 312 revisions were identified across 361 acupuncture points.Revisions related to 'anatomical clarity' accounted for 78.8% (246 cases), primarily involving anatomical term replacements (182 cases, 58.3%) and location or direction refinements (64 cases, 20.5%).The 'format and notation consistency' category comprised 21.2% (66 cases), mainly involving corrections to the identification numbers of adjacent points (33 cases, 10.6%), along with translation refinements and corrections of content mismatches.Conclusions : Through a systematic comparison with WHO Standard and Anatomical Terminology, this study identified 312 specific items requirng revision within KS P 3010:2024.The findings indicate a need for revisions to improve anatomical clarity and descriptive precision, mainly by standardizing anatomical terms and refining location descriptions.In addition, inconsistencies in formatting and notation-including errors in adjacent point identification numbers and translational discrepancies-should be addressed.The revisions proposed in this study provide a concrete framework to enhance the reliability of national standards, ensuring their effective integration into both academic education and digital healthcare industries.

Korean Journal of AcupunctureVol. 43(2)
Kyung Hee University (KR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Proposal for Revising KS P 3010:2024 Based on WHO Standards and Anatomical Terminology — Jowon Jang, Sabina Lim, et al. · Korean Journal of Acupuncture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS