Can the Liberal Order Survive America's Retreat?

Abstract: This essay examines what the United States' retreat from international institutions means for the liberal global order. Under both Trump administrations, the authors argue, Washington has embraced a sovereigntist approach—withdrawing from UN bodies and climate and human-rights instruments, and dismantling USAID in 2025—that is hollowing out the multilateral architecture liberal democracy depends on. The likely result is not outright collapse but a fragmented world of overlapping regional orders with weakened universal institutions at the center, a shift that grows harder to reverse the longer it persists. Crucially, the authors insist the case for reengagement does not rest on idealism: International organizations have been among the most effective instruments of U.S. power, and disengagement simply hands their agendas to autocratic rivals. The window for reengagement remains open, they conclude; the question is whether Washington will move before it closes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of democracy
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2026.a993643
Primary Topic
Globalization and political ideologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can the Liberal Order Survive America's Retreat?

Christina J. Schneider, Stephan Haggard, Christina Cottiero, Emilie M. Hafner-Burton
Journal of democracy
Globalization and political ideologies
article

Can the Liberal Order Survive America's Retreat?

Christina J. Schneider, Stephan Haggard, Christina Cottiero, Emilie M. Hafner-Burton
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay examines what the United States' retreat from international institutions means for the liberal global order. Under both Trump administrations, the authors argue, Washington has embraced a sovereigntist approach—withdrawing from UN bodies and climate and human-rights instruments, and dismantling USAID in 2025—that is hollowing out the multilateral architecture liberal democracy depends on. The likely result is not outright collapse but a fragmented world of overlapping regional orders with weakened universal institutions at the center, a shift that grows harder to reverse the longer it persists. Crucially, the authors insist the case for reengagement does not rest on idealism: International organizations have been among the most effective instruments of U.S. power, and disengagement simply hands their agendas to autocratic rivals. The window for reengagement remains open, they conclude; the question is whether Washington will move before it closes.

Journal of democracyVol. 37(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Globalization and political ideologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.