Gendering Digitalization: Technology Change in Feminized Supermarket Work

ABSTRACT Digitalization is re‐shaping the way work is organized, yet processes of digitalization have largely been examined in male‐dominated workplace contexts like manufacturing and logistics, often with little reference to gender dynamics. This paper explores how workers experience digitalization in the context of a female‐dominated occupation, that of supermarket checkout operators and cashiers. It examines whether gender inequality shapes employee experiences of digitalization, using a multi‐level conception of gender as a social structure that integrates gendered macro structures, interactions and individual experiences. To conduct this multi‐layered analysis, the paper uses a mixed‐methods approach that combines data from stakeholder interviews, a national survey of retail workers and workplace observations of a supermarket. We build on existing scholarship of gender, technology, and work to show that existing structural inequalities in feminized work are reproduced in processes of digitalization in subtle ways, even where there are few visible individual differences in the working experiences of women and men in feminized contexts, arguing that invisibility acts as a mechanism for the perpetuation of gender inequality in times of change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gender Work and Organization
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70206
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gendering Digitalization: Technology Change in Feminized Supermarket Work

Meraiah Foley, Rae Cooper, Laura Good
Gender Work and Organization
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Gendering Digitalization: Technology Change in Feminized Supermarket Work

Meraiah Foley, Rae Cooper, Laura Good
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digitalization is re‐shaping the way work is organized, yet processes of digitalization have largely been examined in male‐dominated workplace contexts like manufacturing and logistics, often with little reference to gender dynamics. This paper explores how workers experience digitalization in the context of a female‐dominated occupation, that of supermarket checkout operators and cashiers. It examines whether gender inequality shapes employee experiences of digitalization, using a multi‐level conception of gender as a social structure that integrates gendered macro structures, interactions and individual experiences. To conduct this multi‐layered analysis, the paper uses a mixed‐methods approach that combines data from stakeholder interviews, a national survey of retail workers and workplace observations of a supermarket. We build on existing scholarship of gender, technology, and work to show that existing structural inequalities in feminized work are reproduced in processes of digitalization in subtle ways, even where there are few visible individual differences in the working experiences of women and men in feminized contexts, arguing that invisibility acts as a mechanism for the perpetuation of gender inequality in times of change.

Gender Work and Organization
The University of Sydney (AU)
Australian Government, University of Sydney, Australian Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gendering Digitalization: Technology Change in Feminized Supermarket Work — Meraiah Foley, Rae Cooper, et al. · Gender Work and Organization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS