Revisiting the Acquisition of Conditionals: Children’s and Adults’ Expression of Hypothetical Thought

Abstract Children produce conditional if -clauses later than other complex constructions, but the source of this delay is debated. On the conceptual complexity explanation, children acquire if -clauses later than other morphosyntactically similar constructions because they are cognitively more complex. On the pragmatic overlap explanation, children produce if -clauses infrequently because other, simpler constructions can convey similar conditional meanings. We tested the two explanations experimentally by eliciting hypothetical language in 3- to 6-year-old children and adults. Children and adults expressed hypotheticality through a variety of grammatical constructions, beyond if -clauses, in accordance with the pragmatic overlap explanation. Across age groups, if -clauses were not delayed compared to other similar constructions, against the conceptual complexity prediction. Still, the data showed important developmental differences: 3- and 4-year-old children rarely expressed conditional meanings, whereas 5- and 6-year-olds were adult-like. These findings suggest that expressing hypothetical thought develops substantially during the preschool years through interacting cognitive, pragmatic, and linguistic factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Language
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000926100762
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Acquisition of Conditionals: Children’s and Adults’ Expression of Hypothetical Thought

Myrto Grigoroglou, Patricia A. Ganea
Journal of Child Language
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Revisiting the Acquisition of Conditionals: Children’s and Adults’ Expression of Hypothetical Thought

Myrto Grigoroglou, Patricia A. Ganea
article en

Abstract

Abstract Children produce conditional if -clauses later than other complex constructions, but the source of this delay is debated. On the conceptual complexity explanation, children acquire if -clauses later than other morphosyntactically similar constructions because they are cognitively more complex. On the pragmatic overlap explanation, children produce if -clauses infrequently because other, simpler constructions can convey similar conditional meanings. We tested the two explanations experimentally by eliciting hypothetical language in 3- to 6-year-old children and adults. Children and adults expressed hypotheticality through a variety of grammatical constructions, beyond if -clauses, in accordance with the pragmatic overlap explanation. Across age groups, if -clauses were not delayed compared to other similar constructions, against the conceptual complexity prediction. Still, the data showed important developmental differences: 3- and 4-year-old children rarely expressed conditional meanings, whereas 5- and 6-year-olds were adult-like. These findings suggest that expressing hypothetical thought develops substantially during the preschool years through interacting cognitive, pragmatic, and linguistic factors.

Journal of Child Language
University of Bucharest (RO), University of Toronto (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.