Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with incident diabetes among U.S. Veterans in a prospective longitudinal cohort

OBJECTIVE: To assess care-seeking patterns and incident diabetes risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a prospective longitudinal cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-based, prospective longitudinal study Epidemiology, Immunology, and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 (EPIC3) and electronic health records from participants with and without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who were free from diabetes at baseline and enrolled between June 2020 and September 2022 (n = 1,212); participants were followed prospectively for a median of approximately 4 years. We fit Cox proportional hazard models to examine associations of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with incident diabetes. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, smoking status, BMI, education, and comorbidities, as well as number of laboratory test days in the year prior. RESULTS: Men comprised 79.4% of the cohort. Median age was 50.1 (SARS-CoV-2-positive) and 57.2 (SARS-CoV-2-negative) years. After accounting for time-varying SARS-CoV-2 infection status, compared to participants with a negative test, participants with a positive test had fewer days/year with clinic visits (18.2 vs. 25.4, p < 0.001), laboratory tests of any kind (3.1 vs. 4.3, p < 0.001), and glucose tests (1.8 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001) post-enrollment; however, the number of days/year on which they had HbA1c tests was not significantly different (0.7 vs. 0.7, p = 0.094); diabetes incidence was 16.1 and 21.2 per 1,000 person-years in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with adjusted diabetes-free survival overall, in inpatients or in outpatients (adjusted HRs: 0.82 [95% CI, 0.51-1.35], 1.03 [0.27-3.96], and 0.79 [0.44-1.39], respectively). CONCLUSION: Although SARS-CoV-2-positive participants used healthcare less often than those without, HbA1c testing rates were similar. We did not replicate prior reports of higher diabetes risk after SARS-CoV-2, although small sample size may have reduced power to detect modest associations. NCT: NCT05764083.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351992
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with incident diabetes among U.S. Veterans in a prospective longitudinal cohort

Jonathan D. Sugimoto, Stuart N. Isaacs, Anna Korpak, Elizabeth Le et al.
PLoS ONE
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with incident diabetes among U.S. Veterans in a prospective longitudinal cohort

Jonathan D. Sugimoto, Stuart N. Isaacs, Anna Korpak, Elizabeth Le, Eric Garshick, Kyong‐Mi Chang, Aaron Baraff, Gary P. Wang, Roger Bedimo, Alexandra Fox, Alaina S Ritter, Pandora L. Wander, McKenna C. Eastment, Kent Heberer, Nicholas L. Smith, Liuye Huang, Jennifer M. Ross, Antonio Anzueto, Jordanna B. Midthun, Javeed A. Shah, Tracy M. Wang, Patrick J. Danaher, Robin L. Jump, Jennifer S. Lee, Daniel K. Morelli
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess care-seeking patterns and incident diabetes risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a prospective longitudinal cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-based, prospective longitudinal study Epidemiology, Immunology, and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 (EPIC3) and electronic health records from participants with and without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who were free from diabetes at baseline and enrolled between June 2020 and September 2022 (n = 1,212); participants were followed prospectively for a median of approximately 4 years. We fit Cox proportional hazard models to examine associations of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with incident diabetes. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, smoking status, BMI, education, and comorbidities, as well as number of laboratory test days in the year prior. RESULTS: Men comprised 79.4% of the cohort. Median age was 50.1 (SARS-CoV-2-positive) and 57.2 (SARS-CoV-2-negative) years. After accounting for time-varying SARS-CoV-2 infection status, compared to participants with a negative test, participants with a positive test had fewer days/year with clinic visits (18.2 vs. 25.4, p < 0.001), laboratory tests of any kind (3.1 vs. 4.3, p < 0.001), and glucose tests (1.8 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001) post-enrollment; however, the number of days/year on which they had HbA1c tests was not significantly different (0.7 vs. 0.7, p = 0.094); diabetes incidence was 16.1 and 21.2 per 1,000 person-years in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with adjusted diabetes-free survival overall, in inpatients or in outpatients (adjusted HRs: 0.82 [95% CI, 0.51-1.35], 1.03 [0.27-3.96], and 0.79 [0.44-1.39], respectively). CONCLUSION: Although SARS-CoV-2-positive participants used healthcare less often than those without, HbA1c testing rates were similar. We did not replicate prior reports of higher diabetes risk after SARS-CoV-2, although small sample size may have reduced power to detect modest associations. NCT: NCT05764083.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
International Vaccine Institute (KR), Harvard University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Florida International University (US), University of Washington (US), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), University of South Florida (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), University of Florida (US), James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), VA North Texas Health Care System (US), North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (US), Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), Stanford Medicine (US), South Texas Veterans Health Care System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Florida College (US), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.