Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognosis in breast cancer based on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT: a two-centre study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and validate preoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT)-based radiomics, deep learning, and combined models for predicting Ki-67 expression status and to preliminarily explore their prognostic value, with the goal of informing preoperative treatment decisions. METHODS: This two-centre study enrolled 636 breast cancer patients, divided into training (n = 310), internal validation (n = 77), external test (n = 78), and prognostic (n = 171) cohorts. Two Ki-67 cut-offs (14% and 30%) were applied. Radiomics models were constructed using five machine learning classifiers, and deep learning models using four three-dimensional architectures (ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet121, and ShuffleNet). The best-performing models from each category were integrated with the clinical model using logistic regression to establish combined models. Prognostic value was evaluated using disease-free survival (DFS) in the prognostic cohort. RESULTS: Among the radiomics models, those based on ExtraTrees and eXtreme Gradient Boosting performed best for the 14% and 30% cut-offs, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.885 and 0.831 in the external test cohort. Among the deep learning architectures, ShuffleNet performed best, with corresponding AUCs of 0.630 and 0.825. Combined models achieved the highest AUCs of 0.895 and 0.869 for the 14% and 30% cut-offs, respectively, in the external test cohort. However, they did not significantly outperform the corresponding radiomics models. In survival analysis, the radiomics score for predicting Ki-67 ≥ 30% was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio: 1.661; 95% confidence interval: 1.142-2.417; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: CE-CBBCT-based radiomics models demonstrated utility as non-invasive tools for the preoperative prediction of high Ki-67 expression defined at both the 14% and 30% cut-offs. The prognostic value of the radiomics score for predicting Ki-67 ≥ 30% was preliminarily demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01082-0
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognosis in breast cancer based on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT: a two-centre study

Yueqiang Zhu, Zhaoxiang Ye, Keyi Bian, Yue Wang et al.
Cancer Imaging
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognosis in breast cancer based on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT: a two-centre study

Yueqiang Zhu, Zhaoxiang Ye, Keyi Bian, Yue Wang, Binglin Lyu, Jiandi Wu, Wenxiu Guo, Jie Jiang, Yue Ma, Yaopan Wu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and validate preoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT)-based radiomics, deep learning, and combined models for predicting Ki-67 expression status and to preliminarily explore their prognostic value, with the goal of informing preoperative treatment decisions. METHODS: This two-centre study enrolled 636 breast cancer patients, divided into training (n = 310), internal validation (n = 77), external test (n = 78), and prognostic (n = 171) cohorts. Two Ki-67 cut-offs (14% and 30%) were applied. Radiomics models were constructed using five machine learning classifiers, and deep learning models using four three-dimensional architectures (ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet121, and ShuffleNet). The best-performing models from each category were integrated with the clinical model using logistic regression to establish combined models. Prognostic value was evaluated using disease-free survival (DFS) in the prognostic cohort. RESULTS: Among the radiomics models, those based on ExtraTrees and eXtreme Gradient Boosting performed best for the 14% and 30% cut-offs, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.885 and 0.831 in the external test cohort. Among the deep learning architectures, ShuffleNet performed best, with corresponding AUCs of 0.630 and 0.825. Combined models achieved the highest AUCs of 0.895 and 0.869 for the 14% and 30% cut-offs, respectively, in the external test cohort. However, they did not significantly outperform the corresponding radiomics models. In survival analysis, the radiomics score for predicting Ki-67 ≥ 30% was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio: 1.661; 95% confidence interval: 1.142-2.417; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: CE-CBBCT-based radiomics models demonstrated utility as non-invasive tools for the preoperative prediction of high Ki-67 expression defined at both the 14% and 30% cut-offs. The prognostic value of the radiomics score for predicting Ki-67 ≥ 30% was preliminarily demonstrated.

Cancer Imaging
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.