Predicting incivility behaviours in the public sector: What role does organisational context play?

Abstract Workplace incivility may seem minor compared to bullying or harassment, but its cumulative impact is profound, eroding employee well‐being, team dynamics, and organisational productivity. Incivility reflects low‐level behaviours and actions (e.g. being rude), which are still detrimental because they contravene workplace norms around manners and respect and can be cumulative. Unlike bullying and abusive supervision, incivility is likely to be ignored because it is seen as inconsequential. Despite this, incivility has strong evidence of having detrimental consequences. A major gap in the literature is around why employees might experience incivility. Further, unlike other destructive social behaviours, incivility has a personal focus, with incivility likely to be experienced from supervisors and peers, but also to be personally instigated. The present study explores organisational‐based self‐esteem to determine whether personal disposition protects public sector employees from incivility experienced and instigated. Further, high‐performance work systems and perceived organisational support are included as moderators (including together) to better understand the role of organisational context in shaping incivility. Using a sample of New Zealand and Australian public sector employees ( n = 356), we find strong support for our hypotheses, although interaction effects typically show that only one form of organisational context is most beneficial. We discuss the implications for the sector. Points for practitioners Public sector employees receive incivility from supervisors and peers at low levels and engage in such behaviours even less. Public sector employees are less likely to receive and engage in incivility when they have strong self‐esteem and work in a context of strong HR practices supporting staff. Combinations of effects show that high self‐esteem and high HR practices lead to the lowest levels of incivility received and engaged in.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.70045
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting incivility behaviours in the public sector: What role does organisational context play?

Jarrod Haar, David Brougham, Muhammad Salman Rashid
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Predicting incivility behaviours in the public sector: What role does organisational context play?

Jarrod Haar, David Brougham, Muhammad Salman Rashid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Workplace incivility may seem minor compared to bullying or harassment, but its cumulative impact is profound, eroding employee well‐being, team dynamics, and organisational productivity. Incivility reflects low‐level behaviours and actions (e.g. being rude), which are still detrimental because they contravene workplace norms around manners and respect and can be cumulative. Unlike bullying and abusive supervision, incivility is likely to be ignored because it is seen as inconsequential. Despite this, incivility has strong evidence of having detrimental consequences. A major gap in the literature is around why employees might experience incivility. Further, unlike other destructive social behaviours, incivility has a personal focus, with incivility likely to be experienced from supervisors and peers, but also to be personally instigated. The present study explores organisational‐based self‐esteem to determine whether personal disposition protects public sector employees from incivility experienced and instigated. Further, high‐performance work systems and perceived organisational support are included as moderators (including together) to better understand the role of organisational context in shaping incivility. Using a sample of New Zealand and Australian public sector employees ( n = 356), we find strong support for our hypotheses, although interaction effects typically show that only one form of organisational context is most beneficial. We discuss the implications for the sector. Points for practitioners Public sector employees receive incivility from supervisors and peers at low levels and engage in such behaviours even less. Public sector employees are less likely to receive and engage in incivility when they have strong self‐esteem and work in a context of strong HR practices supporting staff. Combinations of effects show that high self‐esteem and high HR practices lead to the lowest levels of incivility received and engaged in.

Australian Journal of Public Administration
Massey University (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predicting incivility behaviours in the public sector: What role does organisational context play? — Jarrod Haar, David Brougham, et al. · Australian Journal of Public Administration (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS