Human dimensions of shark conservation: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

Humans are the leading cause of shark mortality in the modern era. Growing recognition of the importance of human dimensions (e.g., perceptions, attitudes, behaviours) for successful shark conservation has driven increased research in recent years. With the aim of mapping key concepts, findings, and gaps, we conducted a scoping review of research that incorporated human participants in the context of sharks and shark conservation ( K = 171). Perceptions were the most frequently investigated human dimension concept, followed by behaviours, experiences, and attitudes. The most researched shark species were hammerheads ( Sphyrna spp.) and white sharks ( Carcharodon carcharias ), although most studies ambiguously referred to “shark(s)” in measures, potentially skewing findings towards prototypical species. Evidence synthesis indicated that tourists and the public held positive attitudes towards sharks, although fear was evident among the public. Tourism may foster positive conservation outcomes and willingness-to-pay to shark conservation; however, studies reported ceiling effects due to participants being already environmentally conscious. Fishers recognised sharks' ecological importance but perceived depredation as increasing due to conservation efforts, and reported feeling underrepresented by management, conservationists, and science. Ocean-users consistently favoured non-lethal shark management, yet awareness of method lethality was low. Knowledge of sharks was positively associated with attitudes towards sharks across participant populations. Overall, we highlight clear, actionable gaps in the literature that future studies should address, and emphasise the need to incorporate social science perspectives in designing, implementing, and interpreting research on human behaviours and experiences in the context of sharks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111976
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human dimensions of shark conservation: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

Tobias Loetscher, Brianna Le Busque, Nadia Siena Jurkovic, Carla Litchfield et al.
Biological Conservation
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
article

Human dimensions of shark conservation: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

Tobias Loetscher, Brianna Le Busque, Nadia Siena Jurkovic, Carla Litchfield, Juliana M. Gleaves
article en

Abstract

Humans are the leading cause of shark mortality in the modern era. Growing recognition of the importance of human dimensions (e.g., perceptions, attitudes, behaviours) for successful shark conservation has driven increased research in recent years. With the aim of mapping key concepts, findings, and gaps, we conducted a scoping review of research that incorporated human participants in the context of sharks and shark conservation ( K = 171). Perceptions were the most frequently investigated human dimension concept, followed by behaviours, experiences, and attitudes. The most researched shark species were hammerheads ( Sphyrna spp.) and white sharks ( Carcharodon carcharias ), although most studies ambiguously referred to “shark(s)” in measures, potentially skewing findings towards prototypical species. Evidence synthesis indicated that tourists and the public held positive attitudes towards sharks, although fear was evident among the public. Tourism may foster positive conservation outcomes and willingness-to-pay to shark conservation; however, studies reported ceiling effects due to participants being already environmentally conscious. Fishers recognised sharks' ecological importance but perceived depredation as increasing due to conservation efforts, and reported feeling underrepresented by management, conservationists, and science. Ocean-users consistently favoured non-lethal shark management, yet awareness of method lethality was low. Knowledge of sharks was positively associated with attitudes towards sharks across participant populations. Overall, we highlight clear, actionable gaps in the literature that future studies should address, and emphasise the need to incorporate social science perspectives in designing, implementing, and interpreting research on human behaviours and experiences in the context of sharks.

Biological ConservationVol. 321
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.