Weapon, wonder or both? Political framings of AI in global north and south media

As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly understood as a political infrastructure and a decision-making technology with the potential to reshape institutions and reconfigure power relations, media coverage plays a key role in shaping public understanding of its risks and opportunities. This study examines how mainstream media outlets in the Global North and Global South politically frame AI, emphasising the implications for digital governance and public opinion. Building on prior work that analyse AI coverage but leaves its political and emotional dimensions underexplored, the research presents a comparative analysis of 6,829 news articles (2010–2024) across twelve newspapers from Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia and Oceania, combining topic modelling and sentiment analysis. The results reveal three temporal phases: an incipient phase (2010–2016), politicisation through crises (2017–2021), and exponential acceleration (2022–2024), with salient inflection points following the Cambridge Analytica scandal (2018) and the launch of ChatGPT (2022). Fifteen thematic frames emerged, dominated by Social Media and Tech Impact (16.03 per cent), Technology and the Digital Economy (12.54 per cent), and China–US Relations and Trade (11.41 per cent). Media outlets in the North display higher levels of pessimistic coverage , with 41.7 per cent of headlines classified as negative. In contrast, media in the South express a more optimistic tone, with 51.5 per cent of headlines being positive. The study demonstrates that media narratives about AI are shaped by geopolitical disputes, differing risk perceptions, and asymmetries in technological power, stressing the need for fair, transparent and ethical AI regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Communication & Society
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2026.2691775
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weapon, wonder or both? Political framings of AI in global north and south media

Bárbara Maria Farias Mota
Information Communication & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Weapon, wonder or both? Political framings of AI in global north and south media

Bárbara Maria Farias Mota
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly understood as a political infrastructure and a decision-making technology with the potential to reshape institutions and reconfigure power relations, media coverage plays a key role in shaping public understanding of its risks and opportunities. This study examines how mainstream media outlets in the Global North and Global South politically frame AI, emphasising the implications for digital governance and public opinion. Building on prior work that analyse AI coverage but leaves its political and emotional dimensions underexplored, the research presents a comparative analysis of 6,829 news articles (2010–2024) across twelve newspapers from Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia and Oceania, combining topic modelling and sentiment analysis. The results reveal three temporal phases: an incipient phase (2010–2016), politicisation through crises (2017–2021), and exponential acceleration (2022–2024), with salient inflection points following the Cambridge Analytica scandal (2018) and the launch of ChatGPT (2022). Fifteen thematic frames emerged, dominated by Social Media and Tech Impact (16.03 per cent), Technology and the Digital Economy (12.54 per cent), and China–US Relations and Trade (11.41 per cent). Media outlets in the North display higher levels of pessimistic coverage , with 41.7 per cent of headlines classified as negative. In contrast, media in the South express a more optimistic tone, with 51.5 per cent of headlines being positive. The study demonstrates that media narratives about AI are shaped by geopolitical disputes, differing risk perceptions, and asymmetries in technological power, stressing the need for fair, transparent and ethical AI regulation.

Information Communication & Society
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.