Effects of Concurrent Strength and Aerobic Exercise Training on Cognitive Health in Adults With Physiological or Neurocognitive Disorders: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Context: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of concurrent strength and aerobic exercise training (CET) on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults with physiological conditions (e.g., type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frailty, fibromyalgia) or neurocognitive disorders (e.g., mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease [AD]). Evidence Acquisition: Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CNKI, WanFang, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CET (≥4 weeks) in clinical populations, reporting global cognition via validated tools (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]). Non-RCTs, acute interventions, healthy populations, and lack of control were excluded. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment independently using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level II. Results: A total of 22 RCTs involving 3463 participants (age range, 43.9-92.1 years; 48% female) were included. Of these, 714 participants had physiological disorders (e.g., diabetes, fibromyalgia, frailty) and 2442 had neurocognitive disorders (e.g., dementia, AD). CET significantly improved global cognitive function compared with controls (SMD = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.50; P < 0.001; I 2 = 67%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant improvements in both physiological disorders (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.49; P < 0.01) and neurocognitive disorders (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.55; P < 0.01). No publication bias was detected (Egger’s test P = 0.62). Conclusion: CET is an effective nonpharmacological intervention for enhancing cognitive health in middle-aged and older adults with physiological or neurocognitive disorders. Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Moderate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381261451825
Primary Topic
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Concurrent Strength and Aerobic Exercise Training on Cognitive Health in Adults With Physiological or Neurocognitive Disorders: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Duanying Li, Jian Sun, Mingyang Zhang, Lijie Lou et al.
Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
article

Effects of Concurrent Strength and Aerobic Exercise Training on Cognitive Health in Adults With Physiological or Neurocognitive Disorders: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Duanying Li, Jian Sun, Mingyang Zhang, Lijie Lou, Kailin Wu, Ruixiang Yan, Junyi Bian
article en

Abstract

Context: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of concurrent strength and aerobic exercise training (CET) on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults with physiological conditions (e.g., type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frailty, fibromyalgia) or neurocognitive disorders (e.g., mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease [AD]). Evidence Acquisition: Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, CNKI, WanFang, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CET (≥4 weeks) in clinical populations, reporting global cognition via validated tools (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]). Non-RCTs, acute interventions, healthy populations, and lack of control were excluded. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment independently using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level II. Results: A total of 22 RCTs involving 3463 participants (age range, 43.9-92.1 years; 48% female) were included. Of these, 714 participants had physiological disorders (e.g., diabetes, fibromyalgia, frailty) and 2442 had neurocognitive disorders (e.g., dementia, AD). CET significantly improved global cognitive function compared with controls (SMD = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.50; P < 0.001; I 2 = 67%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant improvements in both physiological disorders (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.49; P < 0.01) and neurocognitive disorders (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.55; P < 0.01). No publication bias was detected (Egger’s test P = 0.62). Conclusion: CET is an effective nonpharmacological intervention for enhancing cognitive health in middle-aged and older adults with physiological or neurocognitive disorders. Strength-of-Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Moderate.

Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
Western Michigan University (US), Jishou University (CN), Guangzhou Sport University (CN), Hunan Hydro&Power Design Institute (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.