Wound Dressing and Post-Operative Complications Following Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients

Abstract Background Post-operative wound dressings are routine but understudied in reduction mammoplasty. While an ideal dressing should promote healing, limit infection, and be well-tolerated, practice varies widely without consensus. Objectives This study compares the impact of dressings on post-operative outcomes following reduction mammoplasty. Methods A single-institution, retrospective review was performed of reduction mammoplasty patients. Data included demographics, operative details, dressing type, and complications. Dressings included Dermabond (DER), Prineo (PRI), Histoacryl (HIS), Sylke (SYL), Steri-Strips (STE), and combinations (COM). Contralateral breasts in oncoplastic or free-flap cases were excluded. Results 250 patients (439 breasts) were included. At baseline, cohorts differed in BMI, ASA, diabetes, operative time, and resection weight (all p<0.05), largely due to PRI, which contained higher-risk patients. Analyses were repeated, excluding PRI: differences resolved. On univariate analysis, PRI had the highest complication rates. Excluding PRI, HIS had higher skin reaction rates than SYL (p=0.003) and COM (p=0.049), and higher dehiscence than SYL (p=0.043). On multivariate analysis, SYL predicted lower skin reaction (OR 0.21, p=0.003) and dehiscence (OR 0.47, p=0.02). PRI predicted higher reoperation (OR 6.4, p=0.01) and poor scarring (OR 34.8, p<0.001), though limited by baseline confounding. Conclusions Dressing selection may affect wound outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. Sylke tape was associated with lower rates of skin reaction and dehiscence across both analyses, though potentially limited by residual confounding. Prineo’s association with reoperation and poor scarring is notable but difficult to disentangle from patient selection bias. Combination dressings showed lower skin reaction rates but were heterogeneous, making interpretation challenging. Prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag131
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wound Dressing and Post-Operative Complications Following Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients

Salman Choudhry, Steven L. Zeng, Gedge Rosson, Thomas Ren et al.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Wound Dressing and Post-Operative Complications Following Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients

Salman Choudhry, Steven L. Zeng, Gedge Rosson, Thomas Ren, Ricardo C Rodriguez, Nina E Ringelman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Post-operative wound dressings are routine but understudied in reduction mammoplasty. While an ideal dressing should promote healing, limit infection, and be well-tolerated, practice varies widely without consensus. Objectives This study compares the impact of dressings on post-operative outcomes following reduction mammoplasty. Methods A single-institution, retrospective review was performed of reduction mammoplasty patients. Data included demographics, operative details, dressing type, and complications. Dressings included Dermabond (DER), Prineo (PRI), Histoacryl (HIS), Sylke (SYL), Steri-Strips (STE), and combinations (COM). Contralateral breasts in oncoplastic or free-flap cases were excluded. Results 250 patients (439 breasts) were included. At baseline, cohorts differed in BMI, ASA, diabetes, operative time, and resection weight (all p<0.05), largely due to PRI, which contained higher-risk patients. Analyses were repeated, excluding PRI: differences resolved. On univariate analysis, PRI had the highest complication rates. Excluding PRI, HIS had higher skin reaction rates than SYL (p=0.003) and COM (p=0.049), and higher dehiscence than SYL (p=0.043). On multivariate analysis, SYL predicted lower skin reaction (OR 0.21, p=0.003) and dehiscence (OR 0.47, p=0.02). PRI predicted higher reoperation (OR 6.4, p=0.01) and poor scarring (OR 34.8, p<0.001), though limited by baseline confounding. Conclusions Dressing selection may affect wound outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. Sylke tape was associated with lower rates of skin reaction and dehiscence across both analyses, though potentially limited by residual confounding. Prineo’s association with reoperation and poor scarring is notable but difficult to disentangle from patient selection bias. Combination dressings showed lower skin reaction rates but were heterogeneous, making interpretation challenging. Prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.