Predicting consumer loan default risk and systemic risk in financial institutions through machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review

Purpose This study aims to systematically review the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting two major categories of financial risk: consumer loan default risk (CLDR) and systemic risk (SR) arising from institutional interconnectedness. The purpose is to identify the dominant models and methodological trends that define the current research landscape. Design/methodology/approach Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses framework, this review initially retrieved 130 journal articles from the Scopus database, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies were comparatively analyzed to identify common prevailing ML techniques, data sets and evaluation metrics used for predicting CLDR and SR. Findings The review finds that models such as decision trees, support vector machines, naïve Bayes, random forest, LightGBM, XGBoost and artificial neural networks dominate CLDR prediction research. For SR, complex network embeddings methods, graph neural networks, recurrent neural networks (RNN), convolutional neural networks and network centrality measures are prevalent. Research limitations/implications The review also identifies contextual limitations and recommends incorporating hybrid models that combine deep learning with tree-based algorithms and explainable artificial intelligence interpretability for CLDR prediction. For SR, multivariate RNN-based models are recommended, and network-based analyses should be extended to include nonbank intermediaries, incorporating macroeconomic factors, policy environments and broader data sets in future research. Practical implications The findings offer valuable insights for implementing accurate, interpretable ML models to improve loan approval processes, credit risk monitoring and SR mitigation strategies. Social implications Enhanced financial risk prediction can strengthen economic stability, protect consumers from default and mitigate systemic crises, while interpretable ML models promote transparency and trust in automated financial decisions. Originality/value This study offers a comprehensive synthesis of ML approaches to financial risk prediction, emphasizing hybrid models, interpretability and broader systemic analysis. It serves as a guide for researchers and practitioners to develop more robust and context-aware predictive frameworks in financial institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-07-2025-0378
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting consumer loan default risk and systemic risk in financial institutions through machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review

Ahmad Yar, Muhammad Usman
Journal of Modelling in Management
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
article

Predicting consumer loan default risk and systemic risk in financial institutions through machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review

Ahmad Yar, Muhammad Usman
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to systematically review the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting two major categories of financial risk: consumer loan default risk (CLDR) and systemic risk (SR) arising from institutional interconnectedness. The purpose is to identify the dominant models and methodological trends that define the current research landscape. Design/methodology/approach Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses framework, this review initially retrieved 130 journal articles from the Scopus database, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies were comparatively analyzed to identify common prevailing ML techniques, data sets and evaluation metrics used for predicting CLDR and SR. Findings The review finds that models such as decision trees, support vector machines, naïve Bayes, random forest, LightGBM, XGBoost and artificial neural networks dominate CLDR prediction research. For SR, complex network embeddings methods, graph neural networks, recurrent neural networks (RNN), convolutional neural networks and network centrality measures are prevalent. Research limitations/implications The review also identifies contextual limitations and recommends incorporating hybrid models that combine deep learning with tree-based algorithms and explainable artificial intelligence interpretability for CLDR prediction. For SR, multivariate RNN-based models are recommended, and network-based analyses should be extended to include nonbank intermediaries, incorporating macroeconomic factors, policy environments and broader data sets in future research. Practical implications The findings offer valuable insights for implementing accurate, interpretable ML models to improve loan approval processes, credit risk monitoring and SR mitigation strategies. Social implications Enhanced financial risk prediction can strengthen economic stability, protect consumers from default and mitigate systemic crises, while interpretable ML models promote transparency and trust in automated financial decisions. Originality/value This study offers a comprehensive synthesis of ML approaches to financial risk prediction, emphasizing hybrid models, interpretability and broader systemic analysis. It serves as a guide for researchers and practitioners to develop more robust and context-aware predictive frameworks in financial institutions.

Journal of Modelling in Management
Bahria University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.