Assessment of Nurses' Health Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Cancer Screenings: A Cross‐Sectional and Analytical Study

AIM: Nurses' health anxiety and their attitudes towards cancer screenings are interrelated. While high health anxiety shapes risk perception and health behaviours, negative attitudes towards screenings may create barriers to early diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to examine nurses' health anxiety and attitudes towards cancer screenings. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted with 310 nurses working in a university hospital. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, Health Anxiety Inventory and Attitude Scale Towards Cancer Screenings. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine predictors of health anxiety. RESULTS: The mean score on the Attitude Scale Towards Cancer Screenings was 78.7 ± 13.6, and the Health Anxiety Inventory mean score was 15.8 ± 6.3. Subscale averages were 13.1 ± 5.1 for Excessive Sensitivity to Somatic Symptoms and Anxiety, and 2.6 ± 2.0 for Negative Consequences of Disease. Regression analysis indicated that the duration of employment in the current hospital and attitudes towards cancer screenings significantly predicted health anxiety (F = 8.0, p < 0.001), explaining 15.1% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Health anxiety and attitudes towards cancer screenings were significantly associated among nurses. The duration of employment and screening attitudes were identified as predictors of health anxiety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70167
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Nurses' Health Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Cancer Screenings: A Cross‐Sectional and Analytical Study

Dilek Yıldırım, Zühal Bahar, Zeynep Coşkun, Halime Yilmaz et al.
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Assessment of Nurses' Health Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Cancer Screenings: A Cross‐Sectional and Analytical Study

Dilek Yıldırım, Zühal Bahar, Zeynep Coşkun, Halime Yilmaz, Işıl Ergün
article en

Abstract

AIM: Nurses' health anxiety and their attitudes towards cancer screenings are interrelated. While high health anxiety shapes risk perception and health behaviours, negative attitudes towards screenings may create barriers to early diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to examine nurses' health anxiety and attitudes towards cancer screenings. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted with 310 nurses working in a university hospital. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, Health Anxiety Inventory and Attitude Scale Towards Cancer Screenings. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine predictors of health anxiety. RESULTS: The mean score on the Attitude Scale Towards Cancer Screenings was 78.7 ± 13.6, and the Health Anxiety Inventory mean score was 15.8 ± 6.3. Subscale averages were 13.1 ± 5.1 for Excessive Sensitivity to Somatic Symptoms and Anxiety, and 2.6 ± 2.0 for Negative Consequences of Disease. Regression analysis indicated that the duration of employment in the current hospital and attitudes towards cancer screenings significantly predicted health anxiety (F = 8.0, p < 0.001), explaining 15.1% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Health anxiety and attitudes towards cancer screenings were significantly associated among nurses. The duration of employment and screening attitudes were identified as predictors of health anxiety.

International Journal of Nursing PracticeVol. 32(4)
Istanbul Aydın University (TR), Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.