Comparative effectiveness of dapagliflozin <i>vs</i> . empagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A real‐world prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with equivalent Class IA guideline recommendations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HFrEF patients treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective real-world cohort study enrolled 1231 consecutive HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) at Can Tho Central General Hospital, Vietnam (March 2023 to March 2026). Patients received dapagliflozin (n = 622) or empagliflozin (n = 609) as part of optimized guideline-directed medical therapy and the primary outcome was MACE. RESULTS: MACE occurred in 64 patients (10.3%) receiving dapagliflozin and 111 patients (18.2%) receiving empagliflozin. Following propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, dapagliflozin was associated with significantly lower odds of MACE (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.30, 0.67]; p < 0.001). Hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with dapagliflozin (8.7% vs. 14.9%; adjusted OR 0.52; 95% CI [0.33, 0.80]; p = 0.003). Corrected all-cause mortality was 13/622 (2.1%) with dapagliflozin and 25/609 (4.1%) with empagliflozin (p = 0.048). Multivariable logistic regression identified four independent predictors of MACE: New York Heart Association functional class III-IV (adjusted OR 15.54; 95% CI [9.09, 28.99]; p < 0.001), sedentary lifestyle (adjusted OR 2.11; 95% CI [1.42, 3.37]; p < 0.001), premature cardiovascular disease history (adjusted OR 2.30; 95% CI [1.29, 4.43]; p = 0.007) and dapagliflozin as an independent protective factor (adjusted OR 0.47; 95% CI [0.31, 0.68]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world prospective Vietnamese HFrEF cohort followed over 36 months, dapagliflozin was associated with significantly lower odds of MACE and HF hospitalization compared with empagliflozin, with robust adjustment for confounding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70654
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of dapagliflozin vs . empagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A real‐world prospective cohort study

Nhan Dinh Tran, Phong Thanh Pham, Son Kim Tran, Toan Hoang Ngo et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Comparative effectiveness of dapagliflozin vs . empagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A real‐world prospective cohort study

Nhan Dinh Tran, Phong Thanh Pham, Son Kim Tran, Toan Hoang Ngo, Tuong Le Trong Huynh, Thoai Anh Nguyen, Son Ngoc Nguyen, N T Nguyen, Anh Phuoc Lan Nguyen, Huyen Doan Thi Bich Cao, Sang Phu Bui, Trung Quang Le, Hien Dieu Tran
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with equivalent Class IA guideline recommendations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HFrEF patients treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective real-world cohort study enrolled 1231 consecutive HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) at Can Tho Central General Hospital, Vietnam (March 2023 to March 2026). Patients received dapagliflozin (n = 622) or empagliflozin (n = 609) as part of optimized guideline-directed medical therapy and the primary outcome was MACE. RESULTS: MACE occurred in 64 patients (10.3%) receiving dapagliflozin and 111 patients (18.2%) receiving empagliflozin. Following propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, dapagliflozin was associated with significantly lower odds of MACE (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.30, 0.67]; p < 0.001). Hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with dapagliflozin (8.7% vs. 14.9%; adjusted OR 0.52; 95% CI [0.33, 0.80]; p = 0.003). Corrected all-cause mortality was 13/622 (2.1%) with dapagliflozin and 25/609 (4.1%) with empagliflozin (p = 0.048). Multivariable logistic regression identified four independent predictors of MACE: New York Heart Association functional class III-IV (adjusted OR 15.54; 95% CI [9.09, 28.99]; p < 0.001), sedentary lifestyle (adjusted OR 2.11; 95% CI [1.42, 3.37]; p < 0.001), premature cardiovascular disease history (adjusted OR 2.30; 95% CI [1.29, 4.43]; p = 0.007) and dapagliflozin as an independent protective factor (adjusted OR 0.47; 95% CI [0.31, 0.68]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world prospective Vietnamese HFrEF cohort followed over 36 months, dapagliflozin was associated with significantly lower odds of MACE and HF hospitalization compared with empagliflozin, with robust adjustment for confounding.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Can Tho University (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.