Scope and determinants of multisupporterism: the case of Union Saint-Gilloise supporters

While research on football supporterism has extensively examined attachment to a single club, less attention has been paid to multisupporterism, i.e. the partisan attachment to more than one team. This paper seeks to address this gap by examining the prevalence of multisupporterism and identifying factors associated with it, on the basis of an online survey conducted among supporters of Union Saint-Gilloise, a Belgian club. The results show that multisupporterism is widespread and concerns 62.3% of Union supporters. Contrary to what the literature suggests, neither the intensity or duration of involvement nor geographical proximity or performance motivations are linked to multisupporterism. Instead, exclusive Belgian nationality and the importance attached to family tradition are negatively associated with multisupporterism. These findings suggest that multisupporterism does not necessarily reflect weak or volatile loyalties and highlight the need for investigation, including conceptual reflection on what it means to ‘support’ clubs in contemporary football.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soccer and Society
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2026.2693862
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scope and determinants of multisupporterism: the case of Union Saint-Gilloise supporters

Olivier Paye, Thomas Laloux, Félix Aeby
Soccer and Society
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Scope and determinants of multisupporterism: the case of Union Saint-Gilloise supporters

Olivier Paye, Thomas Laloux, Félix Aeby
article en

Abstract

While research on football supporterism has extensively examined attachment to a single club, less attention has been paid to multisupporterism, i.e. the partisan attachment to more than one team. This paper seeks to address this gap by examining the prevalence of multisupporterism and identifying factors associated with it, on the basis of an online survey conducted among supporters of Union Saint-Gilloise, a Belgian club. The results show that multisupporterism is widespread and concerns 62.3% of Union supporters. Contrary to what the literature suggests, neither the intensity or duration of involvement nor geographical proximity or performance motivations are linked to multisupporterism. Instead, exclusive Belgian nationality and the importance attached to family tradition are negatively associated with multisupporterism. These findings suggest that multisupporterism does not necessarily reflect weak or volatile loyalties and highlight the need for investigation, including conceptual reflection on what it means to ‘support’ clubs in contemporary football.

Soccer and Society
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scope and determinants of multisupporterism: the case of Union Saint-Gilloise supporters — Olivier Paye, Thomas Laloux, et al. · Soccer and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS