Seeing Both Sides: A Systematic Review of Identification Methods for Twice-Exceptional Learners

Twice-exceptional learners exhibit both giftedness and disabilities, creating unique learning needs that have been increasingly studied in the gifted education field. Therefore, the goal of this systematic review was to synthesize research on twice-exceptionality, exploring participant demographics, identification and assessment practices, the masking effect, and study purposes. Findings revealed considerable demographic variability, as race/ethnicity and gender generally aligned with U.S. population distributions when adjusted for sample size. Most participants were identified as twice-exceptional by their schools rather than medical/psychological providers, with intelligence tests being the primary method for identifying giftedness. Although 60% of the studies discussed the masking effect, only 7% described how their identification procedures accounted for this effect. Most studies ( n = 80%) described twice-exceptional learner characteristics and assessment options, whereas only 15% explored interventions. This review highlighted the need for future research to move beyond twice-exceptional characterization and toward practical strategies that support twice-exceptional students in educational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
journal for the education of the gifted
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532261459140
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeing Both Sides: A Systematic Review of Identification Methods for Twice-Exceptional Learners

Kathrin E. Maki, Lisa DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa M. Ridgley, Lillian DeShon et al.
journal for the education of the gifted
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Seeing Both Sides: A Systematic Review of Identification Methods for Twice-Exceptional Learners

Kathrin E. Maki, Lisa DaVia Rubenstein, Lisa M. Ridgley, Lillian DeShon, Marie Dougé
article en

Abstract

Twice-exceptional learners exhibit both giftedness and disabilities, creating unique learning needs that have been increasingly studied in the gifted education field. Therefore, the goal of this systematic review was to synthesize research on twice-exceptionality, exploring participant demographics, identification and assessment practices, the masking effect, and study purposes. Findings revealed considerable demographic variability, as race/ethnicity and gender generally aligned with U.S. population distributions when adjusted for sample size. Most participants were identified as twice-exceptional by their schools rather than medical/psychological providers, with intelligence tests being the primary method for identifying giftedness. Although 60% of the studies discussed the masking effect, only 7% described how their identification procedures accounted for this effect. Most studies ( n = 80%) described twice-exceptional learner characteristics and assessment options, whereas only 15% explored interventions. This review highlighted the need for future research to move beyond twice-exceptional characterization and toward practical strategies that support twice-exceptional students in educational settings.

journal for the education of the gifted
Ball State University (US), University of Florida (US), Institute for Learning Innovation (US)
U.S. Department of Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seeing Both Sides: A Systematic Review of Identification Methods for Twice-Exceptional Learners — Kathrin E. Maki, Lisa DaVia Rubenstein, et al. · journal for the education of the gifted (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS