Do interactions matter? Assessing the role of job characteristics interactions on employee well-being.

= 100,000) stratified by industry, gender, age, and employment status. We compared the out-of-sample predictive performance of models capturing main effects (linear mixed-effects models) with models capable of modeling complex interactions (boosting algorithms). The inclusion of interaction effects did not improve predictive accuracy beyond models based solely on main effects. These findings challenge the validity of buffer and boost effects as global mechanisms across jobs and organizations, as interactions among job characteristics did not meaningfully contribute to predicting either burnout or work engagement. Instead, job characteristics appear to exert only additive effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001414
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do interactions matter? Assessing the role of job characteristics interactions on employee well-being.

Jan Digutsch, Richard N. Landers, Clemens Stachl, Yannick A. Metzler et al.
Journal of Applied Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Do interactions matter? Assessing the role of job characteristics interactions on employee well-being.

Jan Digutsch, Richard N. Landers, Clemens Stachl, Yannick A. Metzler, Hans-Joachim Lincke, Matthias Nübling, Gerhard Rinkenauer, Hannah Schade
article en

Abstract

= 100,000) stratified by industry, gender, age, and employment status. We compared the out-of-sample predictive performance of models capturing main effects (linear mixed-effects models) with models capable of modeling complex interactions (boosting algorithms). The inclusion of interaction effects did not improve predictive accuracy beyond models based solely on main effects. These findings challenge the validity of buffer and boost effects as global mechanisms across jobs and organizations, as interactions among job characteristics did not meaningfully contribute to predicting either burnout or work engagement. Instead, job characteristics appear to exert only additive effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Journal of Applied Psychology
University of Minnesota (US), University of Freiburg (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), University of St.Gallen (CH), Institute of Behavioral Sciences (JP), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH), Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE)
Universität St. Gallen
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do interactions matter? Assessing the role of job characteristics interactions on employee well-being. — Jan Digutsch, Richard N. Landers, et al. · Journal of Applied Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS