Immersive virtual reality with synchronous neurostimulation for upper-limb recovery after stroke: a randomized feasibility trial

Stroke affects 15 million people annually and leaves 5 million permanently disabled. In the chronic phase (>3 months after stroke), patients often experience persistent sensorimotor deficits and altered body representation, yet rehabilitation delivery remains partial and inconsistent, highlighting an unmet clinical need. Immersive technologies and noninvasive neurostimulation offer potential for scalable, intensive rehabilitation, but clinical evidence supporting multimodal approaches and objective outcome assessments remains limited. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility, clinical efficacy and assessment capabilities of a multimodal platform (MultiSensy) integrating virtual reality with synchronous transcutaneous sensory neurostimulation. Thirty-four patients with chronic stroke were enrolled in a combined pilot study (n = 9) and randomized, 33-day-long feasibility study (n = 25), where MultiSensy intervention was evaluated against conventional rehabilitation. Primary endpoints included motor function assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and self-body representation assessed by the Body Landmark Test. Secondary outcomes included sensory and functional independence evaluation. Continuous kinematic data were collected to derive objective performance markers. Compared to conventional rehabilitation, MultiSensy resulted in greater motor improvement, reflected by higher FMA-UE (13.17 ± 1.30 versus 7.54 ± 1.48; P = 0.01) and ARAT (8.25 ± 1.96 versus 2.44 ± 1.08; P = 0.029) scores. MultiSensy further improved body self-representation and hand tactile acuity. The platform enabled continuous performance monitoring and extraction of objective kinematic markers that tracked rehabilitation progress. These findings pave the way for larger trials and highlight the potential treatment of multiple patients with fewer physiotherapist visits needed or even home-based sensorimotor rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06400823 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04486-4
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immersive virtual reality with synchronous neurostimulation for upper-limb recovery after stroke: a randomized feasibility trial

Staniša Raspopović, Andrea Cimolato, Olivera C. Djordjević, Ljubica M. Konstantinović et al.
Nature Medicine
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Immersive virtual reality with synchronous neurostimulation for upper-limb recovery after stroke: a randomized feasibility trial

Staniša Raspopović, Andrea Cimolato, Olivera C. Djordjević, Ljubica M. Konstantinović, Giuseppe Valerio Aurucci, Haotian Yao, Tijana Dimkic Tomic, Natalija Secerovic, Maria Dolores Ardura Carnicero
article en

Abstract

Stroke affects 15 million people annually and leaves 5 million permanently disabled. In the chronic phase (>3 months after stroke), patients often experience persistent sensorimotor deficits and altered body representation, yet rehabilitation delivery remains partial and inconsistent, highlighting an unmet clinical need. Immersive technologies and noninvasive neurostimulation offer potential for scalable, intensive rehabilitation, but clinical evidence supporting multimodal approaches and objective outcome assessments remains limited. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility, clinical efficacy and assessment capabilities of a multimodal platform (MultiSensy) integrating virtual reality with synchronous transcutaneous sensory neurostimulation. Thirty-four patients with chronic stroke were enrolled in a combined pilot study (n = 9) and randomized, 33-day-long feasibility study (n = 25), where MultiSensy intervention was evaluated against conventional rehabilitation. Primary endpoints included motor function assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and self-body representation assessed by the Body Landmark Test. Secondary outcomes included sensory and functional independence evaluation. Continuous kinematic data were collected to derive objective performance markers. Compared to conventional rehabilitation, MultiSensy resulted in greater motor improvement, reflected by higher FMA-UE (13.17 ± 1.30 versus 7.54 ± 1.48; P = 0.01) and ARAT (8.25 ± 1.96 versus 2.44 ± 1.08; P = 0.029) scores. MultiSensy further improved body self-representation and hand tactile acuity. The platform enabled continuous performance monitoring and extraction of objective kinematic markers that tracked rehabilitation progress. These findings pave the way for larger trials and highlight the potential treatment of multiple patients with fewer physiotherapist visits needed or even home-based sensorimotor rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06400823 .

Nature Medicine
Institut Mihajlo Pupin (RS), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Belgrade (RS), Klinika za psihijatriju Vrapče (HR), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.