Urban disruptions and housing market dynamics: evidence from San Francisco

Purpose This paper aims to examine how urban disruptions, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic urban disorder, affect housing market dynamics in the San Francisco Bay Area. Using a cross-county comparison and the sale-to-list ratio, the study identifies variations in bargaining power, market tightness and sentiment across price segments and housing types, providing evidence on market resilience and informing policies for urban housing stability and equity. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze 108,237 transactions from 2018 to 2023 using two methods to study housing market behavior during two adverse events. The first is a quintile analysis with a generalized linear model, and the second is a two-stage least squares model to address endogeneity. Findings The San Francisco housing market shows resilience despite economic disruptions, but the impact of time on market (TOM) varies. While longer TOM can lead to competitive bidding in strong markets, this trend weakens during urban disruptions. Noncondominium properties are particularly affected, especially regarding sales premiums. In contrast, Alameda County follows a conventional pattern where longer TOM indicates weaker demand. These findings emphasize how external shocks and urban conditions alter market signals and bargaining dynamics. Practical implications Postpandemic housing market adjustments vary sharply by location and socioeconomic status. In San Francisco, housing shortages and worsening urban disamenities intensify affordability pressures, while remote-work flexibility has accelerated middle-income migration to suburban areas such as Alameda County. Continued outmigration may weaken the urban middle class and long-term fiscal sustainability, highlighting the need for coordinated policies that improve livability and expand housing supply. Originality/value This study effectively combines insights from pandemic and urban policy shocks with cross-county comparisons, demonstrating how local disruptions can significantly transform housing market bargaining, enhance resilience and create impactful spatial spillovers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-04-2026-0122
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban disruptions and housing market dynamics: evidence from San Francisco

Wan-Hsiu Cheng, S. K. Chiu, Chun-Da Chen
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
Housing Market and Economics
article

Urban disruptions and housing market dynamics: evidence from San Francisco

Wan-Hsiu Cheng, S. K. Chiu, Chun-Da Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how urban disruptions, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic urban disorder, affect housing market dynamics in the San Francisco Bay Area. Using a cross-county comparison and the sale-to-list ratio, the study identifies variations in bargaining power, market tightness and sentiment across price segments and housing types, providing evidence on market resilience and informing policies for urban housing stability and equity. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze 108,237 transactions from 2018 to 2023 using two methods to study housing market behavior during two adverse events. The first is a quintile analysis with a generalized linear model, and the second is a two-stage least squares model to address endogeneity. Findings The San Francisco housing market shows resilience despite economic disruptions, but the impact of time on market (TOM) varies. While longer TOM can lead to competitive bidding in strong markets, this trend weakens during urban disruptions. Noncondominium properties are particularly affected, especially regarding sales premiums. In contrast, Alameda County follows a conventional pattern where longer TOM indicates weaker demand. These findings emphasize how external shocks and urban conditions alter market signals and bargaining dynamics. Practical implications Postpandemic housing market adjustments vary sharply by location and socioeconomic status. In San Francisco, housing shortages and worsening urban disamenities intensify affordability pressures, while remote-work flexibility has accelerated middle-income migration to suburban areas such as Alameda County. Continued outmigration may weaken the urban middle class and long-term fiscal sustainability, highlighting the need for coordinated policies that improve livability and expand housing supply. Originality/value This study effectively combines insights from pandemic and urban policy shocks with cross-county comparisons, demonstrating how local disruptions can significantly transform housing market bargaining, enhance resilience and create impactful spatial spillovers.

International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
Tamkang University (TW), Lamar University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.