D- and L-lactate consumers are taxonomically, biochemically, and energetically different

Abstract D- and L-lactate are routinely produced as intermediates in fermentative ecosystems. However, the microbial fate of these stereoisomers remains poorly understood. Given that D-lactate is an unavoidable byproduct of digestion and a neurotoxin, understanding its microbial turnover not only holds ecological pertinence but also the potential to uncover new links between gut microbiota metabolism and host health. Here, we used chemostat bioreactors (pH 7.0, 37°C, and a solids retention time of 4 d) to enrich for lactate-consuming communities. DL-lactate-consuming consortia were enriched, characterized, and used as inoculum for duplicate bioreactors fed exclusively with D- or L-lactate. After steady-state was reached, the fed lactate stereoisomers were switched to assess community resilience. Regardless of the fed stereoisomer, the fermentation product spectra were consistent and dominated by acetate, propionate, and CO2. However, microbial communities and biomass yields diverged sharply, with a high relative abundance of Anaerotignum in D-lactate enrichments and Acidipropionibacterium and Propionibacterium in L-lactate enrichments. Notably, the biomass yield for D-lactate feeding was less than half that for L-lactate feeding, suggesting that the two isomers are metabolized through distinct biochemical pathways despite similar product spectra. Metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses confirmed divergence in D- and L-lactate conversion at both the phylogenetic and pathway levels. Our findings reveal how the stereoisomer identity of microbes shapes their niche specialization, with implications for understanding the ecology and clinical impact of lactate metabolism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISME Communications
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycag180
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D- and L-lactate consumers are taxonomically, biochemically, and energetically different

Alexander Tyakht, Martin Pabst, Largus T. Angenent, Gerben Roelandt Stouten et al.
ISME Communications
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
article

D- and L-lactate consumers are taxonomically, biochemically, and energetically different

Alexander Tyakht, Martin Pabst, Largus T. Angenent, Gerben Roelandt Stouten, Maximilienne Toetie Allaart, Ruth E. Ley
article en

Abstract

Abstract D- and L-lactate are routinely produced as intermediates in fermentative ecosystems. However, the microbial fate of these stereoisomers remains poorly understood. Given that D-lactate is an unavoidable byproduct of digestion and a neurotoxin, understanding its microbial turnover not only holds ecological pertinence but also the potential to uncover new links between gut microbiota metabolism and host health. Here, we used chemostat bioreactors (pH 7.0, 37°C, and a solids retention time of 4 d) to enrich for lactate-consuming communities. DL-lactate-consuming consortia were enriched, characterized, and used as inoculum for duplicate bioreactors fed exclusively with D- or L-lactate. After steady-state was reached, the fed lactate stereoisomers were switched to assess community resilience. Regardless of the fed stereoisomer, the fermentation product spectra were consistent and dominated by acetate, propionate, and CO2. However, microbial communities and biomass yields diverged sharply, with a high relative abundance of Anaerotignum in D-lactate enrichments and Acidipropionibacterium and Propionibacterium in L-lactate enrichments. Notably, the biomass yield for D-lactate feeding was less than half that for L-lactate feeding, suggesting that the two isomers are metabolized through distinct biochemical pathways despite similar product spectra. Metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses confirmed divergence in D- and L-lactate conversion at both the phylogenetic and pathway levels. Our findings reveal how the stereoisomer identity of microbes shapes their niche specialization, with implications for understanding the ecology and clinical impact of lactate metabolism.

ISME Communications
Aarhus University (DK), Max Planck Institute for Biology (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.