Diagnostic yield of the one-year surveillance colonoscopy after curative colorectal cancer resection

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend routine colonoscopy 1 year after curative colorectal cancer resection, despite limited evidence supporting its diagnostic yield. This study evaluated the real-world outcomes of 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using pathology, clinic, and endoscopy data patients who underwent segmental oncologic resection for primary colon or rectal. Adenocarcinoma between January 2007 and June 2020 in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Patients were excluded if they had a total proctocolectomy, if no follow-up colonoscopy data were available, or if the date of the first surveillance scope was < 6 months or > 24 months from surgery. Colonoscopy findings were categorized as adenocarcinoma, advanced adenoma, simple adenoma or normal. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients met the inclusion criteria. The 1-year surveillance colonoscopy detected 2 (0.44%) adenocarcinomas, 3 (0.66%) advanced adenomas, and 87 (19.2%) simple adenomas. The majority (n = 362, 79.7%) had normal colonoscopy results. Preoperative bowel preparation quality was not reported for either recurrent adenocarcinoma. Neither of the recurrent adenocarcinomas was associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), abnormal imaging, or known hereditary cancer syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a low observed rate of clinically significant findings at 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection. Incomplete documentation of index colonoscopy quality limited assessment of whether surveillance findings represented true metachronous lesions or lesions missed at the preoperative examination. Given the low event rate and observational study design, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive real-world data regarding postoperative surveillance outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05187-7
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic yield of the one-year surveillance colonoscopy after curative colorectal cancer resection

Farhana Shariff, Harminder Singh, Garrett Johnson, Ramzi M. Helewa et al.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Diagnostic yield of the one-year surveillance colonoscopy after curative colorectal cancer resection

Farhana Shariff, Harminder Singh, Garrett Johnson, Ramzi M. Helewa, Jenna Cross, Eric Hyun
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend routine colonoscopy 1 year after curative colorectal cancer resection, despite limited evidence supporting its diagnostic yield. This study evaluated the real-world outcomes of 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using pathology, clinic, and endoscopy data patients who underwent segmental oncologic resection for primary colon or rectal. Adenocarcinoma between January 2007 and June 2020 in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Patients were excluded if they had a total proctocolectomy, if no follow-up colonoscopy data were available, or if the date of the first surveillance scope was < 6 months or > 24 months from surgery. Colonoscopy findings were categorized as adenocarcinoma, advanced adenoma, simple adenoma or normal. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients met the inclusion criteria. The 1-year surveillance colonoscopy detected 2 (0.44%) adenocarcinomas, 3 (0.66%) advanced adenomas, and 87 (19.2%) simple adenomas. The majority (n = 362, 79.7%) had normal colonoscopy results. Preoperative bowel preparation quality was not reported for either recurrent adenocarcinoma. Neither of the recurrent adenocarcinomas was associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), abnormal imaging, or known hereditary cancer syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a low observed rate of clinically significant findings at 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection. Incomplete documentation of index colonoscopy quality limited assessment of whether surveillance findings represented true metachronous lesions or lesions missed at the preoperative examination. Given the low event rate and observational study design, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive real-world data regarding postoperative surveillance outcomes.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
St. Boniface Hospital (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.