Effect of preoperative midazolam anxiolysis on anesthetic gas consumption: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Adult patients often experience preoperative anxiety that can influence their anesthetic requirements. We investigated the effect of a preoperative midazolam anxiolytic dose on intraoperative sevoflurane consumption. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved 80 patients undergoing elective surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either intravenous midazolam (0.04 mg/kg) or saline preoperatively. Preoperative anxiety assessment was conducted using the short version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The primary outcome was cumulative sevoflurane consumption within the first hour of surgery. Secondary outcomes included minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), MAC-hour, inspiratory and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, and hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: Sevoflurane consumption in 60 minutes was comparable between the midazolam (mean ± standard deviation: 24.2 ± 3.9 mL) and control (25.2 ± 4.1 mL) groups (P = .291). The study found no statistically significant difference in mean MAC-hour values between the groups administered midazolam (3.3 ± 0.7) and saline (3.4 ± 0.7; P = .612). Anxiety levels and sevoflurane consumption or MAC-hour values were not significantly correlated. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anxiolytic dose of midazolam administration did not significantly reduce intraoperative sevoflurane consumption, and preoperative anxiety levels were not associated with sevoflurane requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049474
Primary Topic
Music Therapy and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of preoperative midazolam anxiolysis on anesthetic gas consumption: A randomized controlled trial

Mediha Türktan, Ersel Güleç, Zehra Hatipoğlu, Dilek Özcengiz et al.
Medicine
Music Therapy and Health
article

Effect of preoperative midazolam anxiolysis on anesthetic gas consumption: A randomized controlled trial

Mediha Türktan, Ersel Güleç, Zehra Hatipoğlu, Dilek Özcengiz, Neslihan Eraslan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adult patients often experience preoperative anxiety that can influence their anesthetic requirements. We investigated the effect of a preoperative midazolam anxiolytic dose on intraoperative sevoflurane consumption. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved 80 patients undergoing elective surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either intravenous midazolam (0.04 mg/kg) or saline preoperatively. Preoperative anxiety assessment was conducted using the short version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The primary outcome was cumulative sevoflurane consumption within the first hour of surgery. Secondary outcomes included minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), MAC-hour, inspiratory and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, and hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: Sevoflurane consumption in 60 minutes was comparable between the midazolam (mean ± standard deviation: 24.2 ± 3.9 mL) and control (25.2 ± 4.1 mL) groups (P = .291). The study found no statistically significant difference in mean MAC-hour values between the groups administered midazolam (3.3 ± 0.7) and saline (3.4 ± 0.7; P = .612). Anxiety levels and sevoflurane consumption or MAC-hour values were not significantly correlated. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anxiolytic dose of midazolam administration did not significantly reduce intraoperative sevoflurane consumption, and preoperative anxiety levels were not associated with sevoflurane requirements.

MedicineVol. 105(26)
Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Music Therapy and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.