FROM SOFT POWER TO STRATEGIC DENIAL: CRICKET AND COERCIVE DIPLOMACY IN INDIA–PAKISTAN RELATIONS

This article reconsiders sport’s role in diplomacy by examining how cricket functions as a source of coercive leverage in contemporary India–Pakistan relations. While much scholarship views sport as soft power or a confidence-building mechanism, India has, since 2012, refused to resume bilateral cricket with Pakistan, while multilateral tournament arrangements have increasingly adapted to preserve its participation. The article argues that India’s dominance within global cricket – rooted in market size, revenues, and institutional influence – has enabled a pattern of sustained denial. By restricting access, conditioning participation, and reshaping tournament arrangements, this pattern imposes financial, symbolic, and reputational costs without overt confrontation, illustrating how sport can function as a form of quiet coercive leverage in asymmetric relationships.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Affairs
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2026.2685174
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FROM SOFT POWER TO STRATEGIC DENIAL: CRICKET AND COERCIVE DIPLOMACY IN INDIA–PAKISTAN RELATIONS

Arijit Mazumdar
Asian Affairs
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

FROM SOFT POWER TO STRATEGIC DENIAL: CRICKET AND COERCIVE DIPLOMACY IN INDIA–PAKISTAN RELATIONS

Arijit Mazumdar
article en

Abstract

This article reconsiders sport’s role in diplomacy by examining how cricket functions as a source of coercive leverage in contemporary India–Pakistan relations. While much scholarship views sport as soft power or a confidence-building mechanism, India has, since 2012, refused to resume bilateral cricket with Pakistan, while multilateral tournament arrangements have increasingly adapted to preserve its participation. The article argues that India’s dominance within global cricket – rooted in market size, revenues, and institutional influence – has enabled a pattern of sustained denial. By restricting access, conditioning participation, and reshaping tournament arrangements, this pattern imposes financial, symbolic, and reputational costs without overt confrontation, illustrating how sport can function as a form of quiet coercive leverage in asymmetric relationships.

Asian Affairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.