Practice patterns in indications, timing, and imaging for clavicle hardware removal: a survey among German-speaking shoulder surgeons

BACKGROUND: Clavicle hardware removal is a standard secondary procedure after fracture fixation, yet clinical decision-making regarding indications, timing, imaging, and postoperative recommendations remains highly variable. Despite the frequency of this intervention, no study to date has systematically assessed real-world practice patterns among shoulder and trauma surgeons in the German-speaking region. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current indications, preferred timing, imaging strategies, and postoperative recommendations related to clavicle hardware removal. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to members of the German-speaking Shoulder and Elbow Society (DVSE). The questionnaire assessed surgeon demographics, surgical experience, annual volume of hardware removal, indications for removal (general and absolute), preferred timing, imaging modalities used for preoperative planning, the influence of fracture location, and recommendations for return to sports. Only complete responses were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: A total of 198 surgeons completed the survey. Irritation (90.9%) and patient preference (87.9%) were the most frequently selected indications for hardware removal, whereas infection (56.6%) was the predominant absolute indication for removal. Most surgeons favored delayed removal: 38.9% recommended hardware removal after more than 18 months, and 42.9% relied on radiographic consolidation as the primary determinant of when to remove the hardware. Radiographs were routinely obtained (99.0%), while CT scans were used selectively (37.4%), particularly for early elective procedures. Most respondents reported no fracture-location-specific differences in removal frequency, although lateral fractures were most cited among those indicating variation. Recommendations for return to sport varied widely, with most surgeons allowing resumption of athletic activity between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Despite the high volume of clavicle hardware removal procedures, management strategies remain heterogeneous, underscoring persistent uncertainty in indications, timing, imaging protocols, and return-to-sport advice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10128-0
Primary Topic
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice patterns in indications, timing, and imaging for clavicle hardware removal: a survey among German-speaking shoulder surgeons

Michael Zyskowski, Philipp Zehnder, Konstantin Kirchhoff, Ahmed Ellafi et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
article

Practice patterns in indications, timing, and imaging for clavicle hardware removal: a survey among German-speaking shoulder surgeons

Michael Zyskowski, Philipp Zehnder, Konstantin Kirchhoff, Ahmed Ellafi, Markus Schwarz, Malik Jessen, Peter Biberthaler
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clavicle hardware removal is a standard secondary procedure after fracture fixation, yet clinical decision-making regarding indications, timing, imaging, and postoperative recommendations remains highly variable. Despite the frequency of this intervention, no study to date has systematically assessed real-world practice patterns among shoulder and trauma surgeons in the German-speaking region. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current indications, preferred timing, imaging strategies, and postoperative recommendations related to clavicle hardware removal. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to members of the German-speaking Shoulder and Elbow Society (DVSE). The questionnaire assessed surgeon demographics, surgical experience, annual volume of hardware removal, indications for removal (general and absolute), preferred timing, imaging modalities used for preoperative planning, the influence of fracture location, and recommendations for return to sports. Only complete responses were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: A total of 198 surgeons completed the survey. Irritation (90.9%) and patient preference (87.9%) were the most frequently selected indications for hardware removal, whereas infection (56.6%) was the predominant absolute indication for removal. Most surgeons favored delayed removal: 38.9% recommended hardware removal after more than 18 months, and 42.9% relied on radiographic consolidation as the primary determinant of when to remove the hardware. Radiographs were routinely obtained (99.0%), while CT scans were used selectively (37.4%), particularly for early elective procedures. Most respondents reported no fracture-location-specific differences in removal frequency, although lateral fractures were most cited among those indicating variation. Recommendations for return to sport varied widely, with most surgeons allowing resumption of athletic activity between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Despite the high volume of clavicle hardware removal procedures, management strategies remain heterogeneous, underscoring persistent uncertainty in indications, timing, imaging protocols, and return-to-sport advice.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Technische Universität München
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.