Understanding the link between information overload and online collective knowledge sharing in construction project teams: a stress and coping perspective

Purpose The adoption of digital collaboration platforms has fundamentally shifted how and where knowledge is shared within construction project teams. Simply, online collective knowledge sharing (OCKS) is becoming increasingly prevalent, while its practical realization is difficult and the underlying inhibitory mechanism has yet to be explored. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in the transactional theory of stress and coping, this study identifies information overload (IO) as an impediment unique in the online collective context and investigates its underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. A field survey of 208 project members (Study 1) and two scenario-based experiments (Study 2) were conducted. Findings Our findings reveal that IO does not exert a direct, unmediated negative effect on OCKS. Instead, it triggers a sequential psychological withdrawal, i.e. decreased psychological safety and consequent diminished felt responsibility to share, ultimately impeding OCKS. Furthermore, hierarchical distance serves as a critical boundary condition, amplifying the negative impact of IO on psychological safety. Originality/value This research contributes to construction knowledge management literature by isolating digital inhibitors and offers managers actionable insights to govern the structural and psychological dimensions of modern digital workspaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2026-0552
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the link between information overload and online collective knowledge sharing in construction project teams: a stress and coping perspective

Ding Wang, Jianyao Jia, Tong Ran
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Understanding the link between information overload and online collective knowledge sharing in construction project teams: a stress and coping perspective

Ding Wang, Jianyao Jia, Tong Ran
article en

Abstract

Purpose The adoption of digital collaboration platforms has fundamentally shifted how and where knowledge is shared within construction project teams. Simply, online collective knowledge sharing (OCKS) is becoming increasingly prevalent, while its practical realization is difficult and the underlying inhibitory mechanism has yet to be explored. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in the transactional theory of stress and coping, this study identifies information overload (IO) as an impediment unique in the online collective context and investigates its underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. A field survey of 208 project members (Study 1) and two scenario-based experiments (Study 2) were conducted. Findings Our findings reveal that IO does not exert a direct, unmediated negative effect on OCKS. Instead, it triggers a sequential psychological withdrawal, i.e. decreased psychological safety and consequent diminished felt responsibility to share, ultimately impeding OCKS. Furthermore, hierarchical distance serves as a critical boundary condition, amplifying the negative impact of IO on psychological safety. Originality/value This research contributes to construction knowledge management literature by isolating digital inhibitors and offers managers actionable insights to govern the structural and psychological dimensions of modern digital workspaces.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
University Of Information Technology (MM), Shandong Youth University of Political Science (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.