Caudal vena cava-to-aorta ratio in hemodynamically stable and unstable client-owned rabbits

Objective: To determine the feasibility of measuring caudal vena cava (CVC) and aorta size in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans of rabbits, variations in size and circularity depending on anatomical location, factors and conditions affecting the CVC-to-aorta (CVC:Ao) ratios, and changes of CVC:Ao ratios in hemodynamically unstable rabbits. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive client-owned rabbits that presented to the Cornell University Hospital for Animals between June 2022 and October 2024 and received an abdominal CT. Forty-nine CT scans from 46 individual rabbits were included. The CVC:Ao ratio was determined similarly to dogs. Hemodynamically instability was assessed by 2 independent blinded investigators. Results: 100% (95% CI, 92.8% to 100%) and 87.8% (95% CI, 75.2% to 95.4%) of the thoracic and abdominal CVC:Ao ratios, respectively, were measurable. Several factors were associated with abdominal and thoracic CVC:Ao ratios and their difference, including a higher difference between abdominal and thoracic ratio in rabbits with intestinal obstruction. The abdominal CVC:Ao ratio and the difference between abdominal and thoracic CVC:Ao ratio were significant predictors of hemodynamic instability, with a 6-fold and 8-fold increase in the odds of hemodynamic instability for every additional unit of these ratios and an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91) and of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93). Conclusions: In diseased rabbits, the aorta and CVC are larger and less circular in the thorax than in the abdomen. In hemodynamic unstable rabbits, the thoracic CVC:Ao ratio decreased while the abdominal CVC:Ao ratio increased, likely owing to gastric compression on the vena cava. Clinical Relevance: CVC:Ao ratios can be used as significant predictors of hemodynamic instability in diseased rabbits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.26.01.0013
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caudal vena cava-to-aorta ratio in hemodynamically stable and unstable client-owned rabbits

Margherita De Silva, Christopher R. Tollefson, Nicola Di Girolamo, Taylor Lashlee et al.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Caudal vena cava-to-aorta ratio in hemodynamically stable and unstable client-owned rabbits

Margherita De Silva, Christopher R. Tollefson, Nicola Di Girolamo, Taylor Lashlee, Armi Pigott, Lauren Thielen
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility of measuring caudal vena cava (CVC) and aorta size in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans of rabbits, variations in size and circularity depending on anatomical location, factors and conditions affecting the CVC-to-aorta (CVC:Ao) ratios, and changes of CVC:Ao ratios in hemodynamically unstable rabbits. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive client-owned rabbits that presented to the Cornell University Hospital for Animals between June 2022 and October 2024 and received an abdominal CT. Forty-nine CT scans from 46 individual rabbits were included. The CVC:Ao ratio was determined similarly to dogs. Hemodynamically instability was assessed by 2 independent blinded investigators. Results: 100% (95% CI, 92.8% to 100%) and 87.8% (95% CI, 75.2% to 95.4%) of the thoracic and abdominal CVC:Ao ratios, respectively, were measurable. Several factors were associated with abdominal and thoracic CVC:Ao ratios and their difference, including a higher difference between abdominal and thoracic ratio in rabbits with intestinal obstruction. The abdominal CVC:Ao ratio and the difference between abdominal and thoracic CVC:Ao ratio were significant predictors of hemodynamic instability, with a 6-fold and 8-fold increase in the odds of hemodynamic instability for every additional unit of these ratios and an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91) and of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93). Conclusions: In diseased rabbits, the aorta and CVC are larger and less circular in the thorax than in the abdomen. In hemodynamic unstable rabbits, the thoracic CVC:Ao ratio decreased while the abdominal CVC:Ao ratio increased, likely owing to gastric compression on the vena cava. Clinical Relevance: CVC:Ao ratios can be used as significant predictors of hemodynamic instability in diseased rabbits.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Cornell University (US), Carolina Veterinary Specialists (US), New York State College of Veterinary Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.