Implementing the National Pediatric Readiness Project in Community Emergency Departments

OBJECTIVES: The National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) offers an evidence-based framework for pediatric emergency readiness, yet implementation in general emergency departments (GEDs) remains variable. The Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinator (PECC) is the central driver of NPRP operationalization. The Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) collaborative formalized the Academic Medical Center (AMC) Partner role-experienced pediatric emergency clinicians providing structured NPRP implementation support to GED PECCs. We characterized AMC Partners' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to GED NPRP implementation and how AMC Partner facilitation supports PECC operationalization across diverse community settings. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 AMC Partners (11 physicians, 12 nurses) from the 2023 ImPACTS collaborative, analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis organized by CFIR 2.0 domains. RESULTS: Implementation determinants spanned all 5 CFIR 2.0 domains. AMC Partners described the NPRP as a legitimizing framework, with GED implementation depending on leadership engagement, protected administrative time, and relationship-based facilitation. Workforce instability, role ambiguity, and low pediatric volume were persistent barriers. AMC Partners functioned as boundary spanners, translating NPRP standards into local action through site visits, simulation-based systems testing, Pediatric Readiness Score audit and feedback, and iterative mentorship. Absence of regional AMC Partner networks was a critical gap. CONCLUSIONS: Successful NPRP implementation requires more than PECC designation. Leadership support, protected time, and structured AMC Partner facilitation are essential. These findings inform development of regional AMC Partner network models to extend support to community, rural, frontier, and Tribal emergency departments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Emergency Care
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003643
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing the National Pediatric Readiness Project in Community Emergency Departments

Elizabeth Sanseau, Ibnat Meah, Cage Cochran, Erin Montgomery et al.
Pediatric Emergency Care
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Implementing the National Pediatric Readiness Project in Community Emergency Departments

Elizabeth Sanseau, Ibnat Meah, Cage Cochran, Erin Montgomery, Marc Auerbach, Ben Michaels, Cynthia Mollen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) offers an evidence-based framework for pediatric emergency readiness, yet implementation in general emergency departments (GEDs) remains variable. The Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinator (PECC) is the central driver of NPRP operationalization. The Improving Pediatric Acute Care Through Simulation (ImPACTS) collaborative formalized the Academic Medical Center (AMC) Partner role-experienced pediatric emergency clinicians providing structured NPRP implementation support to GED PECCs. We characterized AMC Partners' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to GED NPRP implementation and how AMC Partner facilitation supports PECC operationalization across diverse community settings. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 AMC Partners (11 physicians, 12 nurses) from the 2023 ImPACTS collaborative, analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis organized by CFIR 2.0 domains. RESULTS: Implementation determinants spanned all 5 CFIR 2.0 domains. AMC Partners described the NPRP as a legitimizing framework, with GED implementation depending on leadership engagement, protected administrative time, and relationship-based facilitation. Workforce instability, role ambiguity, and low pediatric volume were persistent barriers. AMC Partners functioned as boundary spanners, translating NPRP standards into local action through site visits, simulation-based systems testing, Pediatric Readiness Score audit and feedback, and iterative mentorship. Absence of regional AMC Partner networks was a critical gap. CONCLUSIONS: Successful NPRP implementation requires more than PECC designation. Leadership support, protected time, and structured AMC Partner facilitation are essential. These findings inform development of regional AMC Partner network models to extend support to community, rural, frontier, and Tribal emergency departments.

Pediatric Emergency Care
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Riley Hospital for Children (US), Yale University (US), Impact (CA), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.