Four-dimensional on-beam computed tomography reconstruction using projection-difference images

PURPOSE: Accurate verification of delivered dose requires anatomical information during the treatment beam delivery. However, conventional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is typically acquired prior to beam delivery and fails to account for intrafractional tumor shift/drift. This study aims to develop a 4D On-Beam Computed Tomography (4D OBCT) framework to capture anatomical states during irradiation.
Materials and Methods: A thoracic phantom with rigid tumor motion was used to develop a conformal arc treatment plan. During delivery, the target was displaced by 1 cm superior to its planned position to simulate a baseline shift, and megavoltage transmission data were acquired using an electronic portal imaging device. Transmission data corresponding to the planned tumor position were obtained from the planning CT (pCT) via Monte Carlo simulation. Volumetric difference images were reconstructed from the differences between the measured and simulated transmission data for each phase. Subsequently, the images were superimposed onto the corresponding phases of the 4D pCT to obtain 4D OBCT. For evaluation, we compared 4D OBCT with 4D pCT (ground-truth) and 4D CBCT which were acquired after the target displacement. A dosimetric performance was evaluated by recalculating 4D dose distributions on the three images and comparing in dose-volume histograms and gamma indices.
Results: 4D OBCT achieved lower RMSE than 4D CBCT in both the lung (58.46 HU vs. 74.37 HU) and chest wall regions (23.78 HU vs. 66.84 HU). This quantitative accuracy was also reflected in the dosimetric comparison. Under 2%/2mm and 1%/1mm criteria, 4D OBCT achieved gamma pass rates of 99.76% and 99.08%, respectively, whereas 4D CBCT yielded 72.50% and 57.77%, respectively.
Conclusions: The proposed 4D OBCT framework successfully reconstructed accurate phase-resolved images of the target during irradiation. By providing high-resolution volumetric images that reflect intrafractional motion, 4D OBCT could provide a robust solution for precise post-delivery dosimetric verification and adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae8355
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four-dimensional on-beam computed tomography reconstruction using projection-difference images

Kwang‐Ho Cheong, Hoyeon Lee, Seungryong Cho, Jihyung Yoon et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Four-dimensional on-beam computed tomography reconstruction using projection-difference images

Kwang‐Ho Cheong, Hoyeon Lee, Seungryong Cho, Jihyung Yoon, Jae Won Jung, I Yeo, Joonil Hwang, Raymond Hyunwoo Moon
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate verification of delivered dose requires anatomical information during the treatment beam delivery. However, conventional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is typically acquired prior to beam delivery and fails to account for intrafractional tumor shift/drift. This study aims to develop a 4D On-Beam Computed Tomography (4D OBCT) framework to capture anatomical states during irradiation.
Materials and Methods: A thoracic phantom with rigid tumor motion was used to develop a conformal arc treatment plan. During delivery, the target was displaced by 1 cm superior to its planned position to simulate a baseline shift, and megavoltage transmission data were acquired using an electronic portal imaging device. Transmission data corresponding to the planned tumor position were obtained from the planning CT (pCT) via Monte Carlo simulation. Volumetric difference images were reconstructed from the differences between the measured and simulated transmission data for each phase. Subsequently, the images were superimposed onto the corresponding phases of the 4D pCT to obtain 4D OBCT. For evaluation, we compared 4D OBCT with 4D pCT (ground-truth) and 4D CBCT which were acquired after the target displacement. A dosimetric performance was evaluated by recalculating 4D dose distributions on the three images and comparing in dose-volume histograms and gamma indices.
Results: 4D OBCT achieved lower RMSE than 4D CBCT in both the lung (58.46 HU vs. 74.37 HU) and chest wall regions (23.78 HU vs. 66.84 HU). This quantitative accuracy was also reflected in the dosimetric comparison. Under 2%/2mm and 1%/1mm criteria, 4D OBCT achieved gamma pass rates of 99.76% and 99.08%, respectively, whereas 4D CBCT yielded 72.50% and 57.77%, respectively.
Conclusions: The proposed 4D OBCT framework successfully reconstructed accurate phase-resolved images of the target during irradiation. By providing high-resolution volumetric images that reflect intrafractional motion, 4D OBCT could provide a robust solution for precise post-delivery dosimetric verification and adaptation.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), East Carolina University (US), Yonsei University (KR), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), University of Hong Kong (HK)
University of Hong Kong
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.