Direct- versus video laryngoscopy during suction assisted laryngoscopy and airway decontamination (SALAD): A randomized controlled simulation study

Pulmonary aspiration during airway management is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. First-pass success during tracheal intubation is a key determinant of patient safety and has been shown to improve with videolaryngoscopy (VL). However, comparative evidence regarding hyperangulated VL and direct laryngoscopy (DL) during massive airway contamination remains limited, particularly within a standardized Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) workflow. This study aimed to compare DL and hyperangulated VL in a standardized SALAD simulation model. In this 1:1 randomized controlled simulation study, physicians performed tracheal intubation using a standardized regurgitation model. Participants were randomized to hyperangulated VL or DL. The primary endpoint was first-pass success (FPS). Secondary endpoints included time to successful tracheal intubation and time to first successful ventilation. Two hundred physicians from various specialties were enrolled and randomized. FPS was significantly higher in the VL group than in the DL group (94.0% vs. 58.0%; OR 11.34, 95% CI 4.54-28.35; p < 0.001). Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly shorter in the VL group (median [IQR]: 34 s [29-40] vs. 41 s [35-48]; p < 0.001). Likewise, time to first ventilation was significantly reduced (median [IQR]: 40 s [34-44] vs. 45 s [40-53]; p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, VL remained independently associated with FPS (adjusted OR 13.42, 95% CI 5.18-34.78; p < 0.001), whereas age, sex, professional experience, specialty, and additional qualifications were not significantly associated with the primary outcome. In this simulation model of massive airway contamination, hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy significantly improved first-pass success and reduced both intubation and ventilation times compared with direct laryngoscopy during SALAD-assisted airway management. Whether these procedural advantages translate into improved patient-centered outcomes requires confirmation in future clinical studies. Trial Registration The registration of the clinical trial was initiated prospectively on July 15, 2024, in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034683).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-60056-1
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct- versus video laryngoscopy during suction assisted laryngoscopy and airway decontamination (SALAD): A randomized controlled simulation study

Aleksandar R. Zivkovic, Davut Deniz Uzun, Felix C. F. Schmitt, Benjamin P Zimmermann et al.
Scientific Reports
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Direct- versus video laryngoscopy during suction assisted laryngoscopy and airway decontamination (SALAD): A randomized controlled simulation study

Aleksandar R. Zivkovic, Davut Deniz Uzun, Felix C. F. Schmitt, Benjamin P Zimmermann, Stefan Mohr, Tobias Gruebl, Jan C. Havel, Simon Weiss, Tina Waidner, Markus A. Weigand
article en

Abstract

Pulmonary aspiration during airway management is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. First-pass success during tracheal intubation is a key determinant of patient safety and has been shown to improve with videolaryngoscopy (VL). However, comparative evidence regarding hyperangulated VL and direct laryngoscopy (DL) during massive airway contamination remains limited, particularly within a standardized Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) workflow. This study aimed to compare DL and hyperangulated VL in a standardized SALAD simulation model. In this 1:1 randomized controlled simulation study, physicians performed tracheal intubation using a standardized regurgitation model. Participants were randomized to hyperangulated VL or DL. The primary endpoint was first-pass success (FPS). Secondary endpoints included time to successful tracheal intubation and time to first successful ventilation. Two hundred physicians from various specialties were enrolled and randomized. FPS was significantly higher in the VL group than in the DL group (94.0% vs. 58.0%; OR 11.34, 95% CI 4.54-28.35; p < 0.001). Time to successful tracheal intubation was significantly shorter in the VL group (median [IQR]: 34 s [29-40] vs. 41 s [35-48]; p < 0.001). Likewise, time to first ventilation was significantly reduced (median [IQR]: 40 s [34-44] vs. 45 s [40-53]; p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, VL remained independently associated with FPS (adjusted OR 13.42, 95% CI 5.18-34.78; p < 0.001), whereas age, sex, professional experience, specialty, and additional qualifications were not significantly associated with the primary outcome. In this simulation model of massive airway contamination, hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy significantly improved first-pass success and reduced both intubation and ventilation times compared with direct laryngoscopy during SALAD-assisted airway management. Whether these procedural advantages translate into improved patient-centered outcomes requires confirmation in future clinical studies. Trial Registration The registration of the clinical trial was initiated prospectively on July 15, 2024, in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034683).

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support (DE), Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.