Geographic disparities in gastrointestinal cancer care in the United States

Geographic disparities in cancer care remain a critical public health concern in the United States, particularly for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies that require timely screening, multidisciplinary treatment, and ongoing supportive services. While rural–urban differences in access are well recognized, less is known about how geographic context influences patient-reported barriers, supportive infrastructure, and care navigation across the continuum of GI cancer care. We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional, web-based survey of U.S. adults assessing access to GI cancer screening, treatment availability, supportive services, and healthcare-related barriers. Respondents self-identified their geographic residence as urban, suburban, or rural. Outcomes were compared across geographic groups using chi-square tests and Kruskal–Wallis tests as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between geographic location and key outcomes, adjusting for age and sex. A total of 123 respondents were included, with 47.2% residing in urban, 39.0% in suburban, and 13.8% in rural areas. Overall screening rates for GI and colorectal cancer were high (84.6%) and did not significantly differ by geography. However, significant geographic disparities were observed in supportive care and access burden. Provision of supportive services following treatment was highest among urban respondents (69.0%) and lowest among rural respondents (35.3%; p = 0.009). Consideration of relocating to improve healthcare access differed by geographic location ( p = 0.049). In adjusted analyses, urban residence was independently associated with increased odds of receiving supportive services and considering relocation for improved access. Geographic disparities in GI cancer care are driven less by differences in screening or perceived quality of care and more by inequities in supportive infrastructure and access burden. Efforts to improve equity should prioritize expansion of supportive services, transportation solutions, and care navigation across all geographic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02420-0
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic disparities in gastrointestinal cancer care in the United States

Latha Ganti, Rishank Chillakuru, Tori M. Baer
Discover Public Health
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Geographic disparities in gastrointestinal cancer care in the United States

Latha Ganti, Rishank Chillakuru, Tori M. Baer
article en

Abstract

Geographic disparities in cancer care remain a critical public health concern in the United States, particularly for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies that require timely screening, multidisciplinary treatment, and ongoing supportive services. While rural–urban differences in access are well recognized, less is known about how geographic context influences patient-reported barriers, supportive infrastructure, and care navigation across the continuum of GI cancer care. We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional, web-based survey of U.S. adults assessing access to GI cancer screening, treatment availability, supportive services, and healthcare-related barriers. Respondents self-identified their geographic residence as urban, suburban, or rural. Outcomes were compared across geographic groups using chi-square tests and Kruskal–Wallis tests as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between geographic location and key outcomes, adjusting for age and sex. A total of 123 respondents were included, with 47.2% residing in urban, 39.0% in suburban, and 13.8% in rural areas. Overall screening rates for GI and colorectal cancer were high (84.6%) and did not significantly differ by geography. However, significant geographic disparities were observed in supportive care and access burden. Provision of supportive services following treatment was highest among urban respondents (69.0%) and lowest among rural respondents (35.3%; p = 0.009). Consideration of relocating to improve healthcare access differed by geographic location ( p = 0.049). In adjusted analyses, urban residence was independently associated with increased odds of receiving supportive services and considering relocation for improved access. Geographic disparities in GI cancer care are driven less by differences in screening or perceived quality of care and more by inequities in supportive infrastructure and access burden. Efforts to improve equity should prioritize expansion of supportive services, transportation solutions, and care navigation across all geographic settings.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Wayne State University (US), Brown University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.