Stigmatized but not alone: illiberal coalition-building between Turkey and Hungary

This article examines how Turkey and Hungary cooperated to contest norms of the Liberal International Order (LIO) between 2013 and 2025. Drawing on the content analysis of semi-structured interviews and speeches, it argues that their partnership was rooted in shared experiences of stigmatization by the EU. They reinterpreted EU criticism and stalled accession prospects through civilizational narratives portraying their regimes as unfairly misrecognized. This process of counter-stigmatization created an ideational foundation for mutual recognition and coalition-building. First, in the EU, Hungary and Turkey cooperated to contest enlargement conditionality, by advocating faster and less normative accession and visa liberalization processes. Second, Hungary challenged EU gas diversification efforts by making Turkey’s Russian gas dominated energy hub more visible in the EU via Budapest's observer status in the Organization of Turkic States. The findings contribute to the literature on ontological security, populist foreign policy, and the LIO’s contestation with an ideational perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2684067
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigmatized but not alone: illiberal coalition-building between Turkey and Hungary

László Szerencsés
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Global Security and Public Health
article

Stigmatized but not alone: illiberal coalition-building between Turkey and Hungary

László Szerencsés
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Turkey and Hungary cooperated to contest norms of the Liberal International Order (LIO) between 2013 and 2025. Drawing on the content analysis of semi-structured interviews and speeches, it argues that their partnership was rooted in shared experiences of stigmatization by the EU. They reinterpreted EU criticism and stalled accession prospects through civilizational narratives portraying their regimes as unfairly misrecognized. This process of counter-stigmatization created an ideational foundation for mutual recognition and coalition-building. First, in the EU, Hungary and Turkey cooperated to contest enlargement conditionality, by advocating faster and less normative accession and visa liberalization processes. Second, Hungary challenged EU gas diversification efforts by making Turkey’s Russian gas dominated energy hub more visible in the EU via Budapest's observer status in the Organization of Turkic States. The findings contribute to the literature on ontological security, populist foreign policy, and the LIO’s contestation with an ideational perspective.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Stockholm University (SE)
Stiftung Mercator
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.