Fat aspiration for amyloidosis screening of 2830 patients from 2013 to 2020: compelling sensitivity for AL and better sensitivity in females for all major subtypes

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous fat aspiration is a minimally-invasive screening tool for systemic amyloidosis (SA) with high variability in reported sensitivities. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were studied for consecutive Congo red-stained fat aspirates for amyloidosis screening performed between 2013 and 2020. For sensitivity analysis patients with symptomatic SA proven by either histopathology or scintigraphy and for specificity analysis patients with clinically certain exclusion of SA were chosen. Deposits were classified as substantial when >10% of analyzed tissue stained positive. RESULTS: 1320/2830 probes were positive of which 617 were graded as substantial.Overall sensitivity was 70.0% (1190/1701) according to gold-standard and specificity was 99.4% (613/617). Additionally, in 110/114 patients with clinically certain SA and in 16/398 probes from patients with nonspecific findings amyloid was detected. For subtypes, sensitivities were: systemic light-chain (AL) 90.1% (922/1023), transthyretin wild-type (ATTRwt) 18.8% (69/368), AA 72.3% (107/148) and transthyretin variant (ATTRv) amyloidosis 71% (63/89). Sensitivity overall and in AL, ATTRwt, AA and ATTRv was higher in females. Substantial deposits were more common in females overall and in AL. SUMMARY: Fat aspiration for symptomatic SA yielded excellent specificity. Sensitivity was very good in AL and fair in ATTRv and AA amyloidosis. Sensitivity was higher in females than in males.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amyloid
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13506129.2026.2685673
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fat aspiration for amyloidosis screening of 2830 patients from 2013 to 2020: compelling sensitivity for AL and better sensitivity in females for all major subtypes

Kaya Veelken, Carsten Müller‐Tidow, Christoph Kimmich, Tobias Dittrich et al.
Amyloid
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Fat aspiration for amyloidosis screening of 2830 patients from 2013 to 2020: compelling sensitivity for AL and better sensitivity in females for all major subtypes

Kaya Veelken, Carsten Müller‐Tidow, Christoph Kimmich, Tobias Dittrich, Johan Bijzet, Norbert Blank, Ute Hegenbart, Stefan O. Schönland, Hans LA Nienhuis, Bouke P. Hazenberg
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous fat aspiration is a minimally-invasive screening tool for systemic amyloidosis (SA) with high variability in reported sensitivities. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were studied for consecutive Congo red-stained fat aspirates for amyloidosis screening performed between 2013 and 2020. For sensitivity analysis patients with symptomatic SA proven by either histopathology or scintigraphy and for specificity analysis patients with clinically certain exclusion of SA were chosen. Deposits were classified as substantial when >10% of analyzed tissue stained positive. RESULTS: 1320/2830 probes were positive of which 617 were graded as substantial.Overall sensitivity was 70.0% (1190/1701) according to gold-standard and specificity was 99.4% (613/617). Additionally, in 110/114 patients with clinically certain SA and in 16/398 probes from patients with nonspecific findings amyloid was detected. For subtypes, sensitivities were: systemic light-chain (AL) 90.1% (922/1023), transthyretin wild-type (ATTRwt) 18.8% (69/368), AA 72.3% (107/148) and transthyretin variant (ATTRv) amyloidosis 71% (63/89). Sensitivity overall and in AL, ATTRwt, AA and ATTRv was higher in females. Substantial deposits were more common in females overall and in AL. SUMMARY: Fat aspiration for symptomatic SA yielded excellent specificity. Sensitivity was very good in AL and fair in ATTRv and AA amyloidosis. Sensitivity was higher in females than in males.

Amyloid
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Klinikum Oldenburg (DE), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.