Distributive effects of digital risks and digital infrastructure on financial inclusion in Nigeria: insights from quantile regression

Purpose Despite advancements in mobile technology, Fintech innovation and regulatory reforms, many Nigerians, especially in rural and low-income communities, remain excluded from the digital financial ecosystem. Additionally, rising digital risks (including cybercrime, online fraud, etc.) and poor digital infrastructure continue to erode users’ trust and exacerbate inequality. Whereas there is a growing policy interest in digital finance, there exists limited empirical evidence on digital risks (DRI) and digital infrastructure (DIF) impacts on financial inclusion (FI) across various levels. This study aims to explore DRI and DIF impacts on FI across different access levels in Nigeria, from 2000 to 2024. Design/methodology/approach To achieve this study’s main goal, both Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR) and Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) were used to assess the distributional influence of DFI and DRI on FI in Nigeria. In addition, the principal component analysis (i.e. PCA) was adopted to develop (or construct) composite indexes for DIF, DRI and FI. Findings The results of both SQR and MMQR estimations disclose that DIF fosters FI, while DRI dampens FI across all levels. Furthermore, DIF and DRI impacts vary across FI levels. DIF exerts a greater positive influence at the middle (or 50th) quantile, suggesting that improvements in DIF are most effective in moderately inclusive systems. Conversely, DRI shows more pronounced adverse effects at the lower (25th) quantile, indicating that greater DRI hurts financially less developed segments (or units). Research limitations/implications Although it focuses primarily on Nigeria, the study unravels the significance of minimizing DRI and strengthening digital security, including expanding DIF to enhance users’ trust in (and access to) financial services, to promote FI. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to assess the distributional influence of both DRI and DIF on FI in Nigeria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-08-2025-0337
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distributive effects of digital risks and digital infrastructure on financial inclusion in Nigeria: insights from quantile regression

Nurudeen Abu, Nazatul Faizah Haron, Musa Abdullahi Sakanko
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Economic Growth and Development
article

Distributive effects of digital risks and digital infrastructure on financial inclusion in Nigeria: insights from quantile regression

Nurudeen Abu, Nazatul Faizah Haron, Musa Abdullahi Sakanko
article en

Abstract

Purpose Despite advancements in mobile technology, Fintech innovation and regulatory reforms, many Nigerians, especially in rural and low-income communities, remain excluded from the digital financial ecosystem. Additionally, rising digital risks (including cybercrime, online fraud, etc.) and poor digital infrastructure continue to erode users’ trust and exacerbate inequality. Whereas there is a growing policy interest in digital finance, there exists limited empirical evidence on digital risks (DRI) and digital infrastructure (DIF) impacts on financial inclusion (FI) across various levels. This study aims to explore DRI and DIF impacts on FI across different access levels in Nigeria, from 2000 to 2024. Design/methodology/approach To achieve this study’s main goal, both Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR) and Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) were used to assess the distributional influence of DFI and DRI on FI in Nigeria. In addition, the principal component analysis (i.e. PCA) was adopted to develop (or construct) composite indexes for DIF, DRI and FI. Findings The results of both SQR and MMQR estimations disclose that DIF fosters FI, while DRI dampens FI across all levels. Furthermore, DIF and DRI impacts vary across FI levels. DIF exerts a greater positive influence at the middle (or 50th) quantile, suggesting that improvements in DIF are most effective in moderately inclusive systems. Conversely, DRI shows more pronounced adverse effects at the lower (25th) quantile, indicating that greater DRI hurts financially less developed segments (or units). Research limitations/implications Although it focuses primarily on Nigeria, the study unravels the significance of minimizing DRI and strengthening digital security, including expanding DIF to enhance users’ trust in (and access to) financial services, to promote FI. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to assess the distributional influence of both DRI and DIF on FI in Nigeria.

Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Kaneka (United States) (US), Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY), Federal University of Technology Minna (NG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic Growth and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.