The environmental, social and governance (ESG) dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on energy security

This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on energy security (ENSEC) for 34 developed countries. It offers a new institutional perspective by linking CSR to ENSEC within the framework of sustainable development. MMQR, PLFC, and DID methods are used for this analysis. The MMQR results indicate that CSR enhances ENSEC across all percentiles (10%–90%) in both aggregate and disaggregated analyses, across the social, environmental, and governance dimensions. Moreover, the PLFC model's findings reveal that CSR promotes ENSEC in aggregate, regardless of income level. However, in the disaggregated estimates from the PLFC model, the social dimension of CSR has no effect on ENSEC, whereas the environmental and governance dimensions continue to have a positive effect on ENSEC. As for the impact of China's energy investment, only China's fossil energy investment ensures ENSEC. These findings provide important policy insights by empirically validating the role of CSR in addressing long-term energy risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sources Part B Economics Planning and Policy
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2026.2694484
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The environmental, social and governance (ESG) dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on energy security

İlyas Kays İMAMOĞLU, Cem Işık, Bekhzod Kuziboev, Azka Amin et al.
Energy Sources Part B Economics Planning and Policy
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

The environmental, social and governance (ESG) dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on energy security

İlyas Kays İMAMOĞLU, Cem Işık, Bekhzod Kuziboev, Azka Amin, Serdar Ongan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on energy security (ENSEC) for 34 developed countries. It offers a new institutional perspective by linking CSR to ENSEC within the framework of sustainable development. MMQR, PLFC, and DID methods are used for this analysis. The MMQR results indicate that CSR enhances ENSEC across all percentiles (10%–90%) in both aggregate and disaggregated analyses, across the social, environmental, and governance dimensions. Moreover, the PLFC model's findings reveal that CSR promotes ENSEC in aggregate, regardless of income level. However, in the disaggregated estimates from the PLFC model, the social dimension of CSR has no effect on ENSEC, whereas the environmental and governance dimensions continue to have a positive effect on ENSEC. As for the impact of China's energy investment, only China's fossil energy investment ensures ENSEC. These findings provide important policy insights by empirically validating the role of CSR in addressing long-term energy risks.

Energy Sources Part B Economics Planning and PolicyVol. 21(1)
European University of Lefke (TR), Anadolu University (TR), Bayburt University (TR), Urgench State University (UZ), Western Caspian University (AZ), Ege University (TR), University of Tourism (CR), Institute of Business Management (PK), Economic Research Centre (AZ), Atatürk University (TR), University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.