A Practical Framework for <scp>GT</scp> ‐Seq Panel Optimization

Genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-seq) panels are powerful tools in ecological, evolutionary and conservation genomics, yet the optimization process critical for robust and reproducible genotyping remains poorly formalized. Here, we present an iterative workflow for GT-seq panel optimization that emphasizes systematic refinement, quality control and structured decision-making to improve panel performance across diverse populations and study contexts. We illustrate this framework through the development and optimization of a GT-seq panel for white-tailed deer, a widely distributed and ecologically important North American species. From an initial set of 1200 candidate SNPs selected from a commercial microarray (OVSNP60, containing 72,728 SNPs) and prioritized for high heterozygosity, primers were designed for 646 loci. The final optimized panel contains 508 high-performing markers retained after iterative removal of overamplifying primer pairs, adjustment of primer concentrations, PCR conditions and bioinformatic filtering. The overall proportion of SNPs with more than 70% genotype rate increased from 25.5% in the first optimization round to 87.8% in the final round. Consequently, the overall genotype rate increased from 39.4% to 84%. We also identify key quality-control checkpoints and practical criteria to guide panel refinement and ensure consistent performance. By prioritizing optimization as an integral component of GT-seq panel development, this work provides a reproducible framework for generating robust, high-throughput genotyping tools in non-model species and underscores the importance of iterative refinement to maximize data quality and utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Ecology Resources
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70169
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Practical Framework for GT ‐Seq Panel Optimization

Emily K. Latch, Caitlin N. Ott‐Conn, Peter T. Euclide, Wesley A. Larson et al.
Molecular Ecology Resources
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

A Practical Framework for GT ‐Seq Panel Optimization

Emily K. Latch, Caitlin N. Ott‐Conn, Peter T. Euclide, Wesley A. Larson, Daniel P. Walsh, Randy W. DeYoung, Chandika RG, Angela Schmoldt, Julie A. Blanchong
article en

Abstract

Genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-seq) panels are powerful tools in ecological, evolutionary and conservation genomics, yet the optimization process critical for robust and reproducible genotyping remains poorly formalized. Here, we present an iterative workflow for GT-seq panel optimization that emphasizes systematic refinement, quality control and structured decision-making to improve panel performance across diverse populations and study contexts. We illustrate this framework through the development and optimization of a GT-seq panel for white-tailed deer, a widely distributed and ecologically important North American species. From an initial set of 1200 candidate SNPs selected from a commercial microarray (OVSNP60, containing 72,728 SNPs) and prioritized for high heterozygosity, primers were designed for 646 loci. The final optimized panel contains 508 high-performing markers retained after iterative removal of overamplifying primer pairs, adjustment of primer concentrations, PCR conditions and bioinformatic filtering. The overall proportion of SNPs with more than 70% genotype rate increased from 25.5% in the first optimization round to 87.8% in the final round. Consequently, the overall genotype rate increased from 39.4% to 84%. We also identify key quality-control checkpoints and practical criteria to guide panel refinement and ensure consistent performance. By prioritizing optimization as an integral component of GT-seq panel development, this work provides a reproducible framework for generating robust, high-throughput genotyping tools in non-model species and underscores the importance of iterative refinement to maximize data quality and utility.

Molecular Ecology ResourcesVol. 26(5)
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (US), Iowa State University (US), Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), University of Montana (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.