In Vitro Comparison of Dusting and Fragmentation Techniques Using Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Efficacy and Thermal Impact Assessment

Aim: Due to the potential risks of thermal effects during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy, different techniques may vary in efficacy and safety. This study compares the stone fragmentation efficiency and temperature elevation associated with dusting and fragmentation techniques using the Ho:YAG laser in an experimental model.Material and Methods: Using an artificial renal calyx model, ten experimental tubes and phantom stones were prepared for each technique. Energy settings were 0.5 J–20 Hz for the dusting technique and 1 J–10 Hz for the fragmentation technique. Temperature was measured every minute for five minutes, and stone weights were assessed.Results: The fragmentation technique resulted in significantly greater stone mass reduction from the first minute onward (p < 0.001). Although the average temperature increase was higher in the dusting group, the intergroup difference was insignificant (p = 0.144). In both techniques, the thermal threshold of 43 °C was exceeded at the 2nd to 3rd minute.Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore the importance of choosing a technique for Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. The fragmentation technique was more effective for stone disintegration, while the dusting technique posed a higher thermal risk. The Ho:YAG laser method directly impacts clinical success and patient safety, highlighting the need for further research and careful consideration in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.1728985
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Comparison of Dusting and Fragmentation Techniques Using Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Efficacy and Thermal Impact Assessment

Alpaslan Yüksel, Muhammet Ali Kayıkçı, Yusuf Şenoğlu, Dursun Baba et al.
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

In Vitro Comparison of Dusting and Fragmentation Techniques Using Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Efficacy and Thermal Impact Assessment

Alpaslan Yüksel, Muhammet Ali Kayıkçı, Yusuf Şenoğlu, Dursun Baba, İsmail Eyüp Dilek
article en

Abstract

Aim: Due to the potential risks of thermal effects during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy, different techniques may vary in efficacy and safety. This study compares the stone fragmentation efficiency and temperature elevation associated with dusting and fragmentation techniques using the Ho:YAG laser in an experimental model.Material and Methods: Using an artificial renal calyx model, ten experimental tubes and phantom stones were prepared for each technique. Energy settings were 0.5 J–20 Hz for the dusting technique and 1 J–10 Hz for the fragmentation technique. Temperature was measured every minute for five minutes, and stone weights were assessed.Results: The fragmentation technique resulted in significantly greater stone mass reduction from the first minute onward (p < 0.001). Although the average temperature increase was higher in the dusting group, the intergroup difference was insignificant (p = 0.144). In both techniques, the thermal threshold of 43 °C was exceeded at the 2nd to 3rd minute.Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore the importance of choosing a technique for Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. The fragmentation technique was more effective for stone disintegration, while the dusting technique posed a higher thermal risk. The Ho:YAG laser method directly impacts clinical success and patient safety, highlighting the need for further research and careful consideration in clinical practice.

Konuralp Tıp DergisiVol. 18(2)
State Hospital (GB), Düzce Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.