Polarization and Political Violence: When Polarization Turns Violent

Abstract: This essay challenges the assumption that political polarization leads naturally to political violence. Surveying cases from ancient Alexandria and the Russian pogroms to lynching in the American South, Hindu-Muslim riots in India, and the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, the essay argues that polarization turns deadly only when several forces converge: when affective hostility fuses with fears of demographic change and political displacement, when groups come to see control of the polity as a matter of collective survival, and when the state retreats from enforcing equal protection. Mass democracy heightens the danger by translating demographic difference into political power. Yet fatalism is unwarranted—most polarized societies remain peaceful, and Charlottesville did not become a pogrom because institutions held. The United States, the essay concludes, is not on an inevitable path to violence so long as its civic order and sense of common membership endure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of democracy
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2026.a993641
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarization and Political Violence: When Polarization Turns Violent

Jeffrey Kopstein
Journal of democracy
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Polarization and Political Violence: When Polarization Turns Violent

Jeffrey Kopstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay challenges the assumption that political polarization leads naturally to political violence. Surveying cases from ancient Alexandria and the Russian pogroms to lynching in the American South, Hindu-Muslim riots in India, and the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, the essay argues that polarization turns deadly only when several forces converge: when affective hostility fuses with fears of demographic change and political displacement, when groups come to see control of the polity as a matter of collective survival, and when the state retreats from enforcing equal protection. Mass democracy heightens the danger by translating demographic difference into political power. Yet fatalism is unwarranted—most polarized societies remain peaceful, and Charlottesville did not become a pogrom because institutions held. The United States, the essay concludes, is not on an inevitable path to violence so long as its civic order and sense of common membership endure.

Journal of democracyVol. 37(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.